"I never once denied he was awarded the medal. In fact, I offered an explaination for how it could have been awarded. I was merely pointing out to him that the facts listed in the article that started this thread are factually correct. As is his DD214."
Bullshi-! You're just another google expert. The problem with that easy way out is that you quit when you find something that seems to make an argument that suits the moment.
Life demands much more of us than that. My 68 years are testament to that.
What are you talking about? In post 93 of this threat you latched on to two points in the article and stated "It is pretty clear that the author of this article doesn't know port from starboard." In my response to your post (post 101), I repeated the two points you said were wrong, and showed you why the author is correct. He is correct and you falsely accused him of doing poor research based on your DD214 which we have concluded indicates you were most likely awarded an Army Good Conduct Medal. I am pretty certain the article is talking about the Air Force Good Conduct Medal and the information provided in the article refers specifically to that medal.
"My 68 years are testament to that."
They are testament to something else too.