Yep, and DC political lists a lot of presumably black Dem opponents for Burns (someone with the first name of "Regina" is presumably black no?). Whether they are real, or potential, and whether they have financial resources, I don't know.
This is all pretty good analysis, but I suggest another level of depth is called for.
There is no reason for us to believe the RNC will send out money efficiently. FR should identify those GOP candidates with a solid chance to win AND who are marginally funded.
It is to them that money and volunteer efforts should be sent, regardless of where the FR member lives.
BTW, given the analysis as it stands, we need two things. 1) the above requested list of where money and volunteerism yields the biggest bang for the buck and 2) some probability curves for overall House results in November.
The district, under the old lines, was drawn to elect the son of the then-Senate Majority Leader Charles Walker, who is Black (and currently serving a stint in a Georgia prison for corruption). I'd have to think Black Democrats view the seat as theirs to take. I would say all those challengers listed on the DC political report are Black.