They look a little old to be in diapers...
Considering they were old divorced a year or so ago, your statement is ludicrous.
BTW, do you have any evidence that he left her, and not the other way around?
Posted on 02/18/2006 2:22:12 PM PST by agincourt1415
Did you talk to her on the phone or exchange letters. Tell me what he did to her and your evidence that he did it.
Oops! I shpuld have read furthe. You've already been exposed.
That's a dumb excuse.Oh,I'm thinking of the wrong bush,nevermind.
I was looking at a magazine yesterday...Sheryl Crow on the cover, and thinking how skinny she was, and that she'd latched onto Lance simply to revive her career. And I suddenly knew they'd broken up because he supported the President. I just knew it -- an undeniable gut feeling. I get these feelings once in a while. (Usually it's more along the lines of, oh, no I forgot to turn off the oven!)
They look a little old to be in diapers...
Considering they were old divorced a year or so ago, your statement is ludicrous.
BTW, do you have any evidence that he left her, and not the other way around?
Careful now...she just might enjoy it.
Firstly, I was commenting on another's comparison of the 2. Secondly, whatever you think of her music (and frankly I don't think much of it myself), she does have 8 grammies, a couple of top 10 records, a handful of top 10 singles, so by any objective measure, she is a "rock star", whatever the hell that is. Your suggestion that she is a "one hit wonder" is just incorrect.
I have absolutely no idea who has more money (which is why I did not state anything categorically), and since you also state nothing categorically, you apparently know about as much as I do as regards their finances.
He left his wife in 2003, nearly THREE years ago.
I suspect they have grown since.
"He left his wife in 2003"
See posts #88 and #118. It seems it was the other way around.
And you exposed yourself. 'Nuff said.
BTW, spell check works wonders...consider using it, every now and then.
I spose your right about that. It would be more accurate to say that she really sucks, and is a skank to boot. But that’s all a subjective thing.
That description is no less correct than your description of Lance as a bicycle rider. I'm a bicycle rider. He's a champion of a sport that is wildly popular on the continent where he practiced it. His salary the last few years has been something like 6 million and he has endorsements coming out of his ears. You also might be surprised how little money artists actually see from record sales.
It’s probably true that my assessment of the situation comes partially from my admiration and envy of him, and my distain for that stupid “All I want to do…” ditty, and her air-headed political proclamations.
Uh, not quite, this is your quote:
L.Armstrong is an a-hole for leaving his first wife to deal with three crying babies in diapers.
First of all, that picture was taken in July 2005, they split in September 2003, according to my math that is a year and a half, not 3. There is no way that those three kids were in diapers in 2003.
And you ignored my other question, what evidence do you have that he left her, and not the other way around, or, as both have stated, an amicable separation?
Concert tours are where the money is. But as recording artists get bigger, they also control more of their music. I'd be surprised at this point of her career if she does not own her own music (where I'm sure at the beginning she did not).
I doubt either one of them is hurting for cash.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.