Skip to comments.
Able Danger Hearing Summary
The Strata-Sphere ^
| 2/18/2006
| AJ Strata
Posted on 02/18/2006 1:26:37 PM PST by vadkins
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
If you read nothing else about Able Danger, read this!!
1
posted on
02/18/2006 1:26:41 PM PST
by
vadkins
To: vadkins
Yes, as I thought, that item touching on China yesterday was another important point.
2
posted on
02/18/2006 1:41:32 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: vadkins
3
posted on
02/18/2006 1:43:16 PM PST
by
Illuminatas
(Being conservative means never having to say; "Don't you dare question my patriotism")
To: Cicero
Ms. Gorelick, tear down this wall!
4
posted on
02/18/2006 1:43:48 PM PST
by
the anti-liberal
(Hey, Al Qaeda: Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent)
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: vadkins
They couldn't even nail Clinton on a BJ with a stained dress for evidence, and we expect them to nail MANY in D.C. for even worse things.
Keeping fingers crossed...
6
posted on
02/18/2006 2:33:30 PM PST
by
Supernatural
(All the truth in the world adds up to one big lie! bob dylan)
To: vadkins
Sure looks like this issue is going to come to an end soon. To many people in high places could be tried for treason. Perhaps at least what has expired thus far will go out as a firm warning. Don't commit treason or you may end up in leg irons or the grave. Beyond that, this is going no where. Surely both sides on the hill just want this to go away. I am a bit amazed it was allowed to go this far.
7
posted on
02/18/2006 2:38:59 PM PST
by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned)
To: vadkins; americaprd; ovrtaxt
"Now we can connect some dots. The China study hits Capitol Hill and obviously echoes down Pennsylvania Avenue as Democrats (and possible Reps) wonder if the town is going to be heading back into a second impeachment. My guess is it wasnt because of sufficient number of Republican names (like Rice), but the Clintons are not taking any chances. Gorelick has roots in the Pentagons General Counsel Office and they device a plan to destroy the study using the 90 day rule. This is put into effect, but somehow the Able Danger data is caught up in the mess because the two efforts share the same people and timeframes. What is required for China to disappear is necessary for Able Danger too. That includes purging data, contracts and personnel. DIA and SOCOM grudgingly end up allowing this to happen (but not without a 6 month battle) when they are allowed to open Garland.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
"The lynchpin to understanding what happened to Able Danger is understand the events around Question 1, The China Study reaction. We cannot allow discomfort for partisans and political appointees to trump national defense ever, ever again. We have clearly mixed feelings in the government to get this story put away and protect what is apparently a really great success story. Those who screwed up in 2000 are still in play since Shaffers files were destroyed in 2004. There are people in the DIA (Mark Ewing possibly) and the Pentagon and now apparently on Capitol Hill who were possibly involved with the disruption our national defense in an effort to kill the LIWA China stud. One candidate is a 9-11 Commissioner. What will come of this now I do not know - but after 9-11 and 3000 lives lost we deserve assurances this cannot happen ever again."
Open your eyes, America.
8
posted on
02/18/2006 2:42:38 PM PST
by
brityank
(The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional.)
To: All
We all need to find more effective ways to push the Able Danger story- Here's a heart breaker, the mother of one of the our heroes killed on the USS Cole commented on one of my blog posts at
The Able Danger Blog: Thank you for doing such a good job covering this issue. The information, including links, make your site my first stop most mornings. I wish more Americans were more concerned with this issue. The BIG picture keeps growing as more and more information is learned. I pray we eventually will learn the truth. Thank you, again. Mother of Patrick H. Roy killed in Aden, Yemen aboard USS COLE
9
posted on
02/18/2006 3:45:01 PM PST
by
vadkins
To: vadkins
We all need to find more effective ways to push the Able Danger story-
Local talk shows will have you on. They most likely will not know what you are talking about so be ready for that. I'd keep Curt Weldon's website handy.
10
posted on
02/18/2006 6:07:47 PM PST
by
P-40
(http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
To: Baynative
Thanks for the ping.
To: vadkins; All
thank you for your advice to read this piece and I will. I am far behind in examining this topic and understand, at least in part, that it should be a bipartisan issue? However, I am surprised that the left has not yet found an effective way to nail anything negative about this story on Bush. Yet, being the operative word and if they have, I haven't heard about it.
Tell me, am I going to be disappointed to find that this administration is or may be at fault in some way?
To: vadkins; All
One of the strongest allies we "should" have in the Able Danger fight are the 3,000 victims survivors. Where are they? Why aren't they predominantly in the news? These guys can be Swift Boat vets of sorts if they get organized and on our side!
13
posted on
02/19/2006 5:27:14 PM PST
by
rodguy911
(Support the New Media and F.R.)
To: vadkins
RE: "Well one person does come to mind: Jamie Gorelick. Another Weldon bomb shell was that not only did Gorelick contact him last summer to claim she did nothing wrong, apparently she called Sen Specter twice to convey the same message (Item 31)."
"Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action." --Author: Ian Fleming
14
posted on
02/19/2006 6:06:26 PM PST
by
Seadog Bytes
(OPM - The Liberal 'solution' to every societal problem. (...Other People's Money))
To: Kimberly GG
Pretty clearly the administration is at fault in covering up Able Danger.
15
posted on
02/19/2006 6:33:44 PM PST
by
vadkins
To: Kimberly GG
However, I am surprised that the left has not yet found an effective way to nail anything negative about this story on Bush.
There is plenty in this story that they could nail Bush on but not without nailing Clinton...hence the story dies.
16
posted on
02/19/2006 6:47:12 PM PST
by
P-40
(http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
To: vadkins
Thank you for that link...and for keeping me on the ping list.
I am sickened to no end at what lengths many are going to in order to keep this stroy quiet.
17
posted on
02/20/2006 4:04:39 AM PST
by
SueRae
To: vadkins
18
posted on
02/20/2006 4:05:18 AM PST
by
bmwcyle
(We got permits, yes we DO! We got permits, how 'bout YOU?;))
To: rodguy911
Right, where's that Kimberly Budweisser girl? Didn't she have a group pushing some left wing 911 conspiracy?
People like that might be interested...
19
posted on
02/20/2006 4:08:28 AM PST
by
ovrtaxt
(Join the FR folding team!! http://vspx27.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/main.py?qtype=teampage&teamnum=36120)
To: vadkins
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson