Actually, I probably value your word more than I would "talkorigins".
Well thanks, I think :-)
My point is a finger from that long ago would not look so "good" just because we have seen human flesh that were covered up in the same way the article suggests and they do not look like that (it would be wrinkled, darkened color, etc...). Also the article I pointed out does discuss the CT scan and such.
Besides you almost never find any animal whose flesh is fossilized so well from so long ago. It just seems very very very very very unlikely.
Now... if you found a skull... or even a jawbone that was hominid... doesn't have to be human just a hominid, that would really be something.
Why?