Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jennyp
I have a question that I have never heard an evolutionist bring up before. The question is, if evolution is bunk, then why don't we see all the modern day animals in the fossil record? Why don't we see 40 million year old modern human fossils or 300 million year old horses?
60 posted on 02/18/2006 2:45:36 PM PST by trashcanbred (Anti-social and anti-socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: trashcanbred

It is a good question but it still does not patch any of the giant holes in the TOE.


62 posted on 02/18/2006 2:50:44 PM PST by 05 Mustang GT Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: trashcanbred
Why don't we see 40 million year old modern human fossils or 300 million year old horses?

...in the seventeenth century [1644], in his great work, Dr. John Lightfoot, Vice-Chancellor of the University of Cambridge, and one of the most eminent Hebrew scholars of his time, declared, as the result of his most profound and exhaustive study of the Scriptures, that "heaven and earth, centre and circumference, were created all together, in the same instant, and clouds full of water," and that "this work took place and man was created by the Trinity on October 23, 4004 B.C., at nine o'clock in the morning."

Andrew D. White, A History of the Warfare of Science with Theology in Christendom (D. Appleton and Co., 1897, p. 9).

http://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/ussher.htm


64 posted on 02/18/2006 2:51:34 PM PST by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: trashcanbred
I have a question that I have never heard an evolutionist bring up before. The question is, if evolution is bunk, then why don't we see all the modern day animals in the fossil record? Why don't we see 40 million year old modern human fossils or 300 million year old horses?

The only answer I've ever seen is that what we consider "modern" animals were merely the created kinds that were smarter or faster runners as they sought higher ground during the Flood. Or that the "modern" animals were less dense, so they floated to the top of the sediments as the churned-up muddy waters precipitated out, while the more "primitive" animals were merely the ones that had the denser bodies. Or something along those lines.

69 posted on 02/18/2006 3:02:46 PM PST by jennyp (WHAT I'M READING NOW: The Chicago Manual of Style, 14th ed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson