If the talkers get something wrong...they get it wrong...but they do not deserve to be trashed by their own people. --- BUT, they do deserve and REQUIRE those of us with honest criticism to come forward with that criticism.
It's not "TRASHING" as you continually whine. It is meant by some as constructive criticism.
I have been working in conservative politics since I was handing out "I Like Ike" buttons in '56. So your constant bull about "trashing" is just wrong-headed. Some of us care most likely even more than you do. And we chose to give our opinions on how Sean could be much more influential.
If Sean can't stand to hear that many out here think he'd be even more effective if he cut down on the sanctimonious tone (and improve his poor debating skills), then it's too damn bad for him. Then, that just means he's being petulant and really doesn't care about the conservative message as he proclaims nearly every moment of his life.
I said that in (53)...you either didn't read deep enough or you chose to ignore it. Constructive criticism is good...bad mouthing the people who have the platform to get the message out to the "masses" is not. ...
What you call "constructive criticism" to many here looks a lot like trying to persuade people to abandon Sean Hannity.
BTW...I have been around a lot longer than you..I actually did hand out I like Ike buttons..for I was 19 in '56.
Seriously...I don't think that we are on the same page as far as wanting the talkers "on the right track". It's just the method that we use to keep them there that I have a problem with.