Oh, I know. What gets me as bad, though, is his lack of intellectual honesty. The fact is that, despite what he says when challenged, he will not criticize George W. Bush, even for things that he would (rightfully) criticize coming from Clinton.
Imagine what it's like to NOT share his politics and then trying to listen to him. Ugh!
I can't imagine! Oh wait a minute, I can. It would have a feeling similar to watching CNN or CBS...
EXACTLY! That is exactly my point. His simplistic , name-calling interviews and never-ending self-righteousness would be as repugnant to the left and others as CNN and MSNBC, CBS, etc. are to us.
He serves to energize the opposition with his sanctimony. That is not a good thing.
Sean is sincere, good-hearted and well-intentioned, and he is enthusiastic about what he believes. He does have a message to communicate but he sure could improve his performance.................. or maybe you just can't teach a self-righteous middle-aged kid any new tricks.
It's a shame really.