Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: worldclass

The question arises as to how warm the water was in lower levels. Had it been too warm, would fish have survived? Also, would there not have been variations in ocean water temperatures between the equator and the poles, as there is now?


4 posted on 02/18/2006 7:42:35 AM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Wallace T.

Face it, we are all gonna die!!!!!

Whew!

Now that I got that off my chest, I guess I can go back to what I was doing. :)


5 posted on 02/18/2006 7:44:05 AM PST by Paloma_55 (Which part of "Common Sense" do you not understand???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Wallace T.
first thing to remember climate change is the norm not the unusual as the RATs would have people believe. the huge limestone formations (coral) left by inland seas came from higher concentrations of CO2 in the air. the current alignment of the continents with an arctic ocean tend to lead to cycles of glacial periods not runaway heat. none of the existing climate models correctly represent todays when loaded with past centuries of data. If they can't correctly represent today's conditions they cannot truly estimate the future.
16 posted on 02/18/2006 8:00:09 AM PST by Omglol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Wallace T.

Had it been too warm, would fish have survived? ""

The "fish" of that era were there. Everything adapts or dies.


24 posted on 02/18/2006 8:25:36 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson