Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ditto
In reality, it was a compromise with evil and the hell was paid by the children and grandchildren.

True, very true.

The fact is that the other states choose to compromise. I wonder if it was primarily in the notion of brotherhood to keep all the states together, or if they realized that all the States would have taken an economic loss in order to change such a long-established institution?

453 posted on 02/24/2006 7:08:58 PM PST by MamaTexan (I am NOT a ~legal entity~, nor am I a *person* as created by law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies ]


To: MamaTexan
I wonder if it was primarily in the notion of brotherhood to keep all the states together, or if they realized that all the States would have taken an economic loss in order to change such a long-established institution?

I think the former. The general condition of the economy then was bad pretty much everywhere and the substraction of two small states at the fringe of the country that mostly grew rice at the time would not have changed the economy much. But the people then did put a premium on Unity in those days especially considering that the Europenas expected the states to splinter and fail.

475 posted on 02/25/2006 6:05:18 AM PST by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson