Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MamaTexan
Seems like if they had to be invited, they could also be asked to leave.

But having given up all claim to the property to begin with they were in no position to demand its return.

438 posted on 02/24/2006 5:10:38 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
But having given up all claim to the property to begin with they were in no position to demand its return.

It was theirs to begin with.

Once the contract was dissolved, the terms of the contract were no longer in force.

The State no longer had the legal obligation to recognize the entity of the United States within its own borders. It returned to a SOVERGIN State.

That made Sumner the State's property illegally occupied.

440 posted on 02/24/2006 5:24:48 PM PST by MamaTexan (I am NOT a ~legal entity~, nor am I a *person* as created by law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson