To: Courdeleon02
"In my view the Constitution says nothing explicitly about secession."Demonstrably false.
In the Constitution's Preamble, the intent of the document is put forth as being "to secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our posterity."
Posterity means all of the offspring of a given progenitor.
It was then agreed that the Union was perpetual, to add a clause making the dissolution of a perpetual union illegal would be unnecessarily redundant and needlessly repetitious.
(yes, I intended to be redundant in my statement about being redundant)
379 posted on
02/24/2006 11:35:37 AM PST by
Luis Gonzalez
(Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
To: Luis Gonzalez
Wow! that is really a lose interpretation. Nothing like reading something into a document that says no such thing. You must be a liberal constitutionalist.
To: Luis Gonzalez
It was then agreed that the Union was perpetual, to add a clause making the dissolution of a perpetual union illegal would be unnecessarily redundant and needlessly repetitious. Bwahahahahaha! It was NOT agreed the union was perpetual - a word that had been used 5 times in the Articles of Confederation & Perpetual Union was dropped. The states seceded from the Articles! Repetitious? 5 times in the old agreement, ZERO in the new. Even a single mention would not have been repetitive.
405 posted on
02/24/2006 1:22:32 PM PST by
4CJ
(Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito, qua tua te fortuna sinet.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson