Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stainlessbanner
Well stated, which is exactly why the Articles of Confederation were not applicable to these states. It's a red herring to say "Florida and Alabama" violated the Articles of Confederation; they never agreed to adhere to this document.

A very strange comment that carried to it's logical conclusion would blow your states-rights position to hell.

By agreeing to abide under the constitution new states agreed to all of it's tenants and were granted identical privileges and responsibility as the first 13 states. There is no "Seniority" clause in the Constitutional provision to admit new states and no "greater" or "lesser" states based on longevity. All are equally bound under identical conditions be it Delaware or Hawaii.

339 posted on 02/24/2006 7:18:07 AM PST by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies ]


To: Ditto

No mention of "seniority clause". The Articles of Confederation were replaced by the Constitution, no?


341 posted on 02/24/2006 7:24:24 AM PST by stainlessbanner (Downhome Dixie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson