Any document of the scope of the Constitution will not be easily accessible to those who don't know what they are reading. It is merely a pretense that it is simple. Anyone wishing to understand it must study it intensely for years. My understanding is greater than most of those commenting on it here but I don't pretend to be an expert.
However, those arguing with me generally are clueless as to what it really means. "Unconstitutional" to them just means they don't like something. There are many true experts who disagree with each other. But I can assure you that you will find none on the crackpot sites the Defenders of Slaverocracy depend on to make their pathetic arguments.
As far as I know I have never visited a "crackpot site the Defenders of Slaverocracy", unless this is one.
It is EXTREMELY pretentious to assume you are capable of judging what someone else is capable of understanding based on a couple or even a few silly postings on a web-site.
Further, just because someone doesn't agree with YOU does not mean they do not understand the subject being discussed. There is always the possiblity, however remote, that YOU may be wrong, or that YOU have misinterpreted something.
Finally, it is NOT a pretense that the Constitution is simple and easy to understand. It is written in plain, simple language and only a lawyer, a politician or someone else who is trying to infringe on your (or someone else's) rights would endeavor to make it more complicated than it is.