Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Richard Kimball

That was worth a good head scratch.

Lets see... who runs "security" at the port in 2005... hmm.. US Customs

who will run "security" next year.. US Customs

Please explain "turning over the ports." because the point is lost on me. (You may want to read my other posts in this thread for add'l info)


498 posted on 02/17/2006 8:32:41 PM PST by pacelvi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies ]


To: pacelvi
Sorry, but the post was perfectly clear. If you're scratching your head over it, it may be that you (a) don't comprehend well, or (b) are being ignorant in a clearly rhetorical fashion. US Customs inspects less than 10% of incoming freight at the ports. The company that owns the company running the ports will have significant influence over hiring and port operations.

If you think that the organization responsible for the nuts and bolts operation of the ports isn't in a position to influence the daily operating practices, and that influencing those practices would not put them in a position to deceive customs agents, we clearly disagree.

506 posted on 02/17/2006 9:05:37 PM PST by Richard Kimball (I like to make everyone's day a little more surreal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson