To: SirLinksalot
For him, rejecting evolution is like trying to understand chemistry without the Periodic Table of the Elements or arguing that Earth is flat. Well, except that we can demonstrate the existence of elements and the rotundity of the planet. Can't do that with macroevolution.
15 posted on
02/17/2006 11:06:05 AM PST by
Recovering_Democrat
((I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!))
To: Recovering_Democrat
Can't do that with macroevolution. Another day, another load.
18 posted on
02/17/2006 11:24:21 AM PST by
narby
(Hillary! The Wicked Witch of the Left)
To: Recovering_Democrat
For him, rejecting evolution is like trying to understand chemistry without the Periodic Table of the Elements or arguing that Earth is flat. Well, except that we can demonstrate the existence of elements and the rotundity of the planet. Can't do that with macroevolution.
Except that the Periodic Table of the Elements is
only a theory - and a shaky one at that:
![](http://www.atomicjetpacks.com/bmbcrevo/pix/per-table500x540.gif)
More and more people with high IQs are rejecting Mendeleevism. Teach the controversy!
37 posted on
02/17/2006 1:09:14 PM PST by
jennyp
(WHAT I'M READING NOW: The Chicago Manual of Style, 14th ed.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson