To: notigar
It's not that they could have covered up the event itself. It's that they could have said it was someone else who pulled the trigger.
I have no idea since I don't hunt and I don't drink. But its not like they pull the CSI team out to do the investigation. I'm assuming it's more like a traffic accident where they interview everyone on the scene.
Of course, he the man had died, that would be a different thing. This is just my point: If it was a cover up, it wasn't a very good one. They spoke to local authorities almost immediately, called the press as soon as possible, told the story publicly, let the President know.
The complaint is just that the Washington Press Corp didn't get top billing.
To: pollyannaish; notigar
There wasn't a cover up in any way, shape or form.
It is however, a DNC talking point to claim there was.
(This man's been listening to James Carville).
41 posted on
02/17/2006 7:42:50 AM PST by
ohioWfan
(PROUD Mom of an Iraq War VET! THANKS, son!!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson