Charen ping!
Please FReepmail me if you would like to be added to, or removed from, the Mona Charen ping list...
Posted on 02/17/2006 5:51:20 AM PST by blitzgig
Please FReepmail me if you would like to be added to, or removed from, the Mona Charen ping list...
Why do you keep bringing this up?
Ok, if I ever get over these conniptions, I'll ponder those considerations. Thanks.
(It will explain a lot if you are......)
You might. And I'm not. But I probably would've gotten a lot more action than I did at the high school I did go to.
*Snort*
I brought it up because it was topical! what do you mean "why?"
Exactly. And when faced with a situation where they SHOULD be ashamed and embarassed, rather than admit their mistake, they ramp it up to areas none of us can even imagine.
It's the newsroom equivalent of "staying on too long" in a comedy show.
True. In this specific case, however, there is NO evidence whatsoever that anyone was drunk in the Cheney/Whittington accident.
I was saying it theoretically.
Can you try to keep up here, dear?
(And you would probably have more to say here if you had tried to get some intellectual 'action' in High School).
Yes. That title says it all, doesn't it?
Projecting an assumed set of facts in this case, is nothing but pure and total fabrication.
Look, at post 69, you said they determined it was an accident. I said, of course it was. Then the terminally rude Always Right said to me "but you implied he was drinking" or words to that effect. So I said, even if he was drunk, it was still an accident. THAT is how it was topical.
And so we can accuse you of being a pedophile with no evidence? Just thoretically speaking of course.
Bush wouldn't be able to give Cheney a pardon because he has to behave as the "un-Clinton"...and his power of pardons only extends to offenses against the United States. Shooting a Texas lawyer doesn't qualify, I don't think. Of course Bush could pressure the governor of Texas to cough up a pardon...
You are just digging yourself a deeper hole.
I'm certain you say plenty of things without any evidence. Why stop now?
Don't forget Hillary's interview with Matt Lauer a few days after the Monica Lewinsky story broke open, giving marching orders to the media and other Democrats to treat the whole story as the product of a "vast right-wing conspiracy." Despite the preposterousness of her claim, that turned the tide in Clinton's favor.
"So, you tell me, is it true that a cop wanted to talk to him and he was turned away, or not?"
OK Perry Mason. Now go away.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.