1 posted on
02/17/2006 5:27:39 AM PST by
Tolik
To: neverdem; Lando Lincoln; quidnunc; .cnI redruM; yonif; SJackson; dennisw; monkeyshine; Alouette; ...
2 posted on
02/17/2006 5:28:36 AM PST by
Tolik
To: Tolik
"Either way, no one should doubt that a nuclear Iran would end the entire notion of global adjudication of nuclear proliferation as well as remain a recurrent nightmare to civilization itself. " what sane person could possibly argue with that?
3 posted on
02/17/2006 5:37:33 AM PST by
Kelly_2000
( Because they stand on a wall and say nothing is going to hurt you tonight. Not on my watch)
To: Tolik
"Israel has nuclear weapons, so why single out Iran?" Because the Israelis aren't nutters. Next?
"Pakistan got nukes and we lived with it."
The Pakistanis aren't nutters, either.
"Who is to say the United States or Russia should have the bomb and not other countries?"
We're not nutters, and neither are the Russians (with some notable exceptions on both sides, none likely to get anywhere near the button).
"Iran has promised to use its reactors for peaceful purposes..."
:-D )))
4 posted on
02/17/2006 5:43:53 AM PST by
RichInOC
(Good news, Mahmoud: The Mahdi is coming back soon. Bad news: He's Jewish.)
To: Tolik
Ordinary, on the ground Iranians must be made aware of the dangerous position their loony-toon president has put them.
Deliberate, accidental release of 2nd strike damage projections thru the Int'l media might help.
They should be made aware the a MIRV or two will spoil your whole day.
5 posted on
02/17/2006 5:44:39 AM PST by
leadhead
(It’s a duty and a responsibility to defeat them. But it's also a pleasure)
To: Tolik
...the administration apparently does not wish to relive the nightmare of the past three years in which striking Iran will conjure up all the old Iraqi-style hysteria ... Then unleash the Israelis. They have more to lose from a nuclear Iran than we do, and they're perfectly competent enough to stage a successful attack.
6 posted on
02/17/2006 5:45:13 AM PST by
Noachian
(To control the courts the people must first control their Congress.)
To: Tolik
8 posted on
02/17/2006 5:47:26 AM PST by
Irishguy
(How do ya LIKE THOSE APPLES!!!!)
To: Tolik
In nuclear poker, the appearance of derangement is an apparent advantage.
I thought he was talking about Al Gore....
10 posted on
02/17/2006 5:53:31 AM PST by
P-40
(http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
To: Tolik
Hanson's worst writing ever.
A dog's breakfast of insider commentary thrown together like dirty laundry.
12 posted on
02/17/2006 6:19:30 AM PST by
CBart95
To: Tolik
color me paranoid, but militant islam (iran) with nukes scares me more than militant commies (N. Korea).
15 posted on
02/17/2006 9:11:40 AM PST by
Conservomax
(There are no solutions, only trade-offs.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson