Skip to comments.
Arab takeover of U.S. ports seen as security 'insanity'
World Net Daily ^
| Posted: February 15, 2006February 15, 2006 3:24 p.m. Eastern
| WorldNetDaily
Posted on 02/16/2006 9:41:40 PM PST by Cinnamon
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
To: TheCrusader
I'm not saying we *should* allow the transfer to go through. I'm just saying the guy is right that the probability of such an attack is very low.
To: TBP
. . . we're not serious about the War on Terror. Open borders. Transfer of technology to third world and communist countries. Communist Chinese and now Islamic control of U.S. ports. You're beginning to get it.
22
posted on
02/16/2006 11:40:42 PM PST
by
Euro-American Scum
(A poverty-stricken middle class must be a disarmed middle class)
To: Cinnamon
SWEET JESUS!...SAVE US NOW!!!!...What putifried NUMB NUT TRAITOR thought this up????!!!!!
To: Dad yer funny
Michael Savage talked about it too. He even interviewed Mark Foley (R-Fla.). They both said they can't believe they agree with Schummer on something. To me this is like aunt Harriet all over again only 5 times worse. But we convinced Bush to change his mind before we can do it again. Call or write your Congressman now!
24
posted on
02/17/2006 12:38:22 AM PST
by
madconserv
(Proud to be FReepin--Support Our Troops)
To: AngelesCrestHighway
Your friends, the Arabs, must have done some real sweet talking to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States and then on up.
25
posted on
02/17/2006 12:46:24 AM PST
by
madconserv
(Proud to be FReepin--Support Our Troops)
To: Cinnamon
"Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., also spoke out against the merger, which is scheduled to be finalized March 2."
"Should we be outsourcing our own security?" Schumer said on the Fox News Channel. "We have to have hands-on control of things. And to have United Arab Emirates I mean, they are a country that's allied with the U.S., but at the same time a whole bunch of the (September 11) hijackers came from the United Arab Emirates."
Chuck Schumer is right. We are in trouble if Schumer is making this much since. Maybe Schumer should have Chertoff's job since it is difficult to imagine anyone being a less competent Homeland Security Chief.
26
posted on
02/17/2006 12:46:31 AM PST
by
sangrila
To: sangrila
Chuck Schumer is right. We are in trouble if Schumer is making this much sense. Yeah. I never thought I'd find myself agreeing with Schumer on anything, but...
To: neverdem; Tolik; Travis McGee
28
posted on
02/17/2006 12:54:49 AM PST
by
King Prout
(many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
To: billybudd
Are you serious? We might never know that weapons came through one of these ports even after we are attacked. Once 5 nukes come in through Baltimore Harbor and get dispersed to NYC, Chicago, LA, Boston, and D.C. it probably won't matter much who did what. My support for this administration is dwindling. I really see no point in fighting wars overseas if we are going to have Dubai running our port security on the east coast, all the while our borders are wide open. I've supported this President as much as possible and still do, but if this deal goes through that support will be all but gone other than my inherit respect for the office itself.
29
posted on
02/17/2006 1:00:27 AM PST
by
sangrila
To: TBP
How in the frickin' world can Bush be so right on some things and soooo wrong on others? Whats up with this guy? I'm serious! This is whats wrong with compassionate conservatism.
30
posted on
02/17/2006 1:03:58 AM PST
by
madconserv
(Proud to be FReepin--Support Our Troops)
Comment #31 Removed by Moderator
To: TBP
Who proposed this, and who were the biggest advocates of this deal?
32
posted on
02/17/2006 1:08:14 AM PST
by
sangrila
To: War_On_Liberalism
the UAE is still ARAB and muslim, and that's bad enough all by itself to make this a bad idea.
33
posted on
02/17/2006 1:10:08 AM PST
by
King Prout
(many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
Comment #34 Removed by Moderator
To: Cinnamon
A foolish nation and sanity are soon parted.
35
posted on
02/17/2006 1:19:00 AM PST
by
The Duke
To: madconserv
My friends the ahabs???...put down your drink mate!
To: King Prout
The UAE was one of the few nations that ever recognized the Taliban.
Did War on Liberalism get taken out?
37
posted on
02/17/2006 1:29:53 AM PST
by
sangrila
To: AngelesCrestHighway
Sarcasm, my friend, sarcasm.
38
posted on
02/17/2006 1:32:19 AM PST
by
madconserv
(Proud to be FReepin--Support Our Troops)
To: sangrila
dunno - what causes you to ask?
39
posted on
02/17/2006 1:36:23 AM PST
by
King Prout
(many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
To: sangrila
oh. deleted comments. I guess so, then, but I can't imagine why based on s/h/it's comments to me
40
posted on
02/17/2006 1:37:16 AM PST
by
King Prout
(many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson