Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Boot Hill
That is exactly what this is about. Glad it only took 107 posts for someone to state it! The "what" is going to contain an awful lot of redacting and black-out!

Yup. See also Post 48 ;-)

184 posted on 02/17/2006 4:12:39 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
LOL, you and I did the same thing with the link that "K-oneTexas" posted in #37. One read and it was clear that this decision was no big deal. However, it will get a bit dicey when the plaintiffs get a couple dozen boxes of this...


And the judge tries to order an in camera hearing to determine for himself whether the redaction was reasonable. That could turn into a mess.

185 posted on 02/17/2006 4:27:38 AM PST by Boot Hill ("...and Joshua went unto him and said: art thou for us, or for our adversaries?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson