Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lepton
You might want to look here. Generally, warrants aren't required in cases where there's no substantial likelihood of a "U.S. person" (citizen or permanent alien resident) being surveilled. But I think it's been acknowledged with this latest NSA program that U.S. citizens have come under surveillance.
65 posted on 02/16/2006 2:54:15 PM PST by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: inquest
Generally, warrants aren't required in cases where there's no substantial likelihood of a "U.S. person" (citizen or permanent alien resident) being surveilled. But I think it's been acknowledged with this latest NSA program that U.S. citizens have come under surveillance.

And THERE is quite a loop. The surveillance is of foreign agents, with specific recognition in the cited law as not needing warrants. Excluding it because they happen to call people in the U.S. from time to time is silly.

Anyways, the President is authorized and empowered by the Constitution to be the CINC. Inerent in executing this duty is collecting military information. Again, the gray area is not in collecting the information for military and diplomatic intelligence purposes. It is not a civil or criminal prosecution, nor abusing collection resources for politics.

70 posted on 02/16/2006 3:18:28 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson