Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wcdukenfield
The "necessary and proper" clause!

Good heavens, well it could be worse- he could have cited the "general welfare" clause.

The Articles of Confederation gave congress the powers so many want to give them roday: "making rules for the government and regulation of the said land and naval forces, and directing their operations."
But the Founders changed that in the Constitution- they wanted a strong executive. And one who could always act militarily in defense- on his own power.

"FRIDAY AUGUST 17th. IN CONVENTION
...Mr. MADISON and Mr. GERRY moved to insert "declare," striking out "make" war; leaving to the Executive the power to repel sudden attacks.
Mr. SH[E]RMAN thought it stood very well. The Executive shd. be able to repel and not to commence war."
The vote was 7 to 1.

53 posted on 02/16/2006 2:09:17 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mrsmith
So, you got whupped on this thread, and are now repeating the same misconceptions here that were shot down there. What a surprise.

Providing rules for operations is not the same as directing them. Not in this language.

55 posted on 02/16/2006 2:19:31 PM PST by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson