[hinckley buzzard]

It would never be necessary to kill a billion people. That is not the point. It may well be the point to obliterate numerous arab and other moslem capitals, however, including mecca and medina and whatever other hellholes they consider sacred. That would need to be followed by a worldwide embargo of travel against the remaining moslems, keeping them penned in their own countries, concurrently with a severe deportation program from civilized nations. Military regencies would need to be installed to govern the remnant populations and wipe out whatever vestiges of this criminal "religion" might survive.

Japan worked because we crushed their cultural illusions with two atomic bombs, defeated their emporer and bent him to our will, and put on an overwhelming display of conventional might on VJ Day.

The Japanese who mattered knew that resistance was not only futile but would be fatal. A defeat of corresponding proportions will be necessary to bring reason to the islamic backwaters.

[Restorer]

A remarkable number of people seem to come up with the idea that we must take option 3, kill them all.

I have little objection to killing enough Muslim leaders to induce them to change their minds about continuing this war, and none at all about killing all the Islamists.

But I'm not up for killing "all Muslims." 1. It isn't necessary. 2. It would be wrong.