Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saddam Tapes: What They Don't Prove (NBC's Trick?)
Newsweek ^ | Feb. 20, 2006 | Mark Hosenball and Michael Isikoff

Posted on 02/15/2006 11:14:29 AM PST by excludethis

Government investigators are trying to determine how 12 hours of tape recordings of Saddam Hussein and his aides, acquired by U.S. personnel in Iraq, got into the hands of the organizers of a private "intelligence summit" to be held in D.C. next weekend. John Loftus, a former government prosecutor and self-described whistle-blower, claims the tapes "will be able to provide a few definitive answers to some very important—and controversial—weapons-of-mass-destruction questions." At one point Saddam muses how vulnerable D.C. would be to a "biological" attack, but adds that Iraq wouldn't do it. House Intelligence Committee chairman Pete Hoekstra is reviewing transcripts to determine if U.S. officials missed WMD evidence after the war. But intel agencies are skeptical. The tapes were taken without permission from an FBI-run translation center, officials say, and are years old. Two government officials, requesting anonymity because of the sensitive subject, say the tapes in no way prove that WMD stockpiles or programs existed at the time of the U.S. invasion or were moved to another country before U.S. troops arrived.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: intelligencesummit; iraq; saddam; saddamtapes; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Williams

Anything with the byline "Michael Isikoff" need be first considered as anti-Bush propaganda. Not that I'm much of a Bush defender, but the Isikoff articles are almost 100% made to instruct the liberal establishment how to disregard inconvenient revelations.


21 posted on 02/15/2006 11:37:24 AM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: excludethis

Vee know nussing, vee see nussing, vee hear nussing.


22 posted on 02/15/2006 11:54:26 AM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy; Mitchell

Loftus himself said
last night
on the John Batchelor program
that two administration officials were not pleased
that these tapes were to be released.

It is a bit puzzling why this should be.


23 posted on 02/15/2006 11:55:33 AM PST by Allan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Allan; Mitchell

After the whole
Libby imbroglio
I do not know
what "administration official" means anymo'


24 posted on 02/15/2006 12:08:05 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: excludethis

This article is the reason for the existence of the blogosphere.


25 posted on 02/15/2006 12:13:14 PM PST by Taliesan (The power of the State to do good is the power of the State to do evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wasanother
The MSM is scared now. They are trying to disprove an issue before all the facts come out and may never come out if they can help it.

Yes. And unnamed sources are very useful in this type of denial story.

26 posted on 02/15/2006 12:15:10 PM PST by fella ("(News) should be the maximum of information & minimum of comment." - Cobden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: excludethis
...the tapes in no way prove that WMD stockpiles or programs existed at the time of the U.S. invasion ...

The key word here is "stockpiles". WMD have been found. One single IED had an estimated 8 million lethal doses of Sarin. Fortunately, it was not deployed correctly and no one was seriously injured by the Sarin.

But clearly Iraq had the capability to take out a city the size of Washington DC, given the right delivery system.

27 posted on 02/15/2006 12:15:58 PM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams
This article is incredible.

What's also incredible is that our MSM is trying to protect Saddam Hussein while simultaneously trying to bring down the Vice-President during a time of war.

-PJ

28 posted on 02/15/2006 12:17:38 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too; All

CSPAN -2 , 3:15 ET (now)

Tierney on Plasma from Saturday am


29 posted on 02/21/2006 12:14:33 PM PST by Kimberly GG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson