[Coyoteman]

B) Biology teachers should teach Darwin’s theory of evolution, but also the scientific evidence against it.

There is no credible scientific evidence against the theory of evolution.

There are a lot of people who, for religious reasons, refuse to accept evolution and, from this refusal, contort science (what I call "pretzel science") in a vain effort to discredit evolution. This contortion of science is not science.

Another perfect example of this "pretzel science" is flood geology.

[cogitator]

There is no credible scientific evidence against the theory of evolution.

Yes, yes, I know.

[onja]

There are many evidences.
Of COURSE there are the numerous lies and fakes that some scientists have done. This is what I'm mostly interested in people teaching. They just quietly take something out when it's proven wrong and very few know of it. And also...

The "living fossils" have ALL remained unchanged since the fossil times.

The fact that Evolution has never been seen, observed, or tested makes it not science along with creation (The observation , identification, description, experimental investigation , and theoretical explanation of phenomena.)

The fact that we have no proof of "missing links". The human missing links could very well be what?-humans!

The law that complex systems, if left to their own devices, will degrade not upgrade.

The raw mathematics is nearly impossible. The chance in 1 in a ton. Way above the 10 to the 130th or something that rules impossibility.

These are just a few of them. There are many more and I'm a amateur. Also another thought. I've seen a good deal of people with the thick upper-brow of the Neanderthals. Is that just chance or some blending of the old Neanderthal genes?