Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AliVeritas
But they have no qualms about showing hearings on our national security when it gives the enemy info.

I would think that these hearings (Able Danger) are more damaging to national security than the NSA hearings were. The Able Danger hearings show how the dots can be connected, which enables a person aiming to be stealthy to avoid leaving a "dot connecting trail."

The NSA hearings were all about legal interpretation of balance of powers, and general policy.

256 posted on 02/15/2006 12:41:35 PM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt
I would think that these hearings (Able Danger) are more damaging to national security than the NSA hearings were. The Able Danger hearings show how the dots can be connected, which enables a person aiming to be stealthy to avoid leaving a "dot connecting trail."

The real evidence itself is never going to be presented out in open session; that's all going to be closed. And I think Weldon is enough of a patriot that he would never leak anything that would actually damage national security.

280 posted on 02/15/2006 12:52:28 PM PST by jpl ("We don't negotiate with terrorists, we put them out of business." - Scott McClellan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt
Not leave dot connecting trial.

That's not easy, it adds considerably to the difficulty of the effort, thus limits effectiveness of the bad actors. AND be so doing that itself creates remarkable activities and pattern -- albeit at more local levels.

593 posted on 02/15/2006 2:19:06 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson