Posted on 02/14/2006 7:12:57 PM PST by outofhere2
So help me, I would sue his butt off! I guess the REPORT that stated "NO ALCOHOL" was 'forged' in his mind or O'Donnell failed to READ IT!!!
And he said that the sheriff's men were turned away from the ranch.
And people right here at FR have said today that the "no alcohol involved" probably means they had been drinking but it wasn't a factor.
Olbermann Raises Possible Negligent Homicide" Charge, That Cheney Was Drunk
Posted by Brent Baker on February 15, 2006 - 00:01.
http://newsbusters.org/node/4044
I hate that gay SOB.
I have about had ENOUGH of this ****!!!
The development isn't likely to put the vice president in any legal peril, and the local district attorney said late yesterday that he has seen nothing so far to indicate charges are warranted. But whether the incident causes lasting political damage may yet depend on how Mr. Cheney responds, and whether it appears to the public that the vice president is being treated differently from other hunters involved in accidental shootings.
http://tinyurl.com/cj5qh
I'm telling you right now, if you link me to a Peggy Noonan article about this, I'm going to beat my dog.
OP-ED COLUMNIST
Shooter Slips on a Silencer
By MAUREEN DOWD
Published: February 15, 2006
The luckless 78-year-old is in intensive care after a heart attack, and still his friend, the vice president, is Swift-BB-ing him.
LOL! And I'm out.
Perfect example of how the right and left differ.
Coulter calls the terroists "ragheads" and some conservatives denounce her as the next Adolph Hitler while other prissy souls faint from embarrassment.
Meanwhile, Loony-tunes O'Donnell call the V-P drunk or goes postal on a decorated Vietnam Vet (O'Niel)and there is NO critism from the liberals.
O'Donnell carries on like nothing happened. Just like Maher, remember all his outragous comments.
Thank you - that's much more clear now.
The authorities were promptly notified.
There was no alcohol involved.
The MSM is misreporting the story.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0213061cheney1.html
To Everyone,
Prior to O'Donnell's breakdown on Scarborough, he flared up on another pundit's show. I forget the guy's name. I think the host of the show used to be a jesuit. It was during the 2004 campaign and the news about Cheney's daughter being a lesbian came out. Do you remember that that imbicile Kerry used it in a debate with Bush to try and hurt him. He was criticized for using that information in the debate and later O'Donnell defended Kerry by saying something to the effect that Cheney has a lesbian daughter, she's a lesbian who has lesbian sex and whats wrong with a lesbian having lesbian sex if she's a lesbian. He rambled on and everyone just watched him implode as he endeavored to get the word LESBIAN said as many times as he could and tie it to Cheney. Of course the theory then was that upon hearing it, Bush's religious, conservative supporters would abandon him. The attempt had the opposite effect. But again, I invite everyone to type in Lawrence O'Donnell in the Freeper SEARCH to find his exact words on Cheney's lesbian daughter. It's more bizarre then I can recall it. One thing is for sure, O'Donnell's got some stirring issues.
Actually, a bunch of the moonbats calling into C=SPAM Journal show on Monday did.
It's common hater stuff.
LOL. MSNBC apologized for O'Donnell's outburst against O'Neill but O'Donnell never apologized. Although he's been pretty scarse of late, O'Donnell's behavior last night shows to me that MSNBC had no problem with O'Donnell's outburst in 2004 and hires him to insult people the network doesn't like. I see O'Donnell as a mouthpiece for them.
-PJ
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.