Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldFriend
I don't consider 9% profit to be excess.

But why, when they are that profitable, do they need a government subsidy in the form of a royalty waiver?

60 posted on 02/16/2006 4:44:46 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
But why, when they are that profitable, do they need a government subsidy in the form of a royalty waiver?

Because the royalty waivers were part of the incentive that got them take the Exploration/Production risks in the first place. The waivers were granted during the Clinton administration (the stain got one right).

Between '97 and '99 crude prices dropped to between $10 - $15 per barrel and slick was trying to use the incentive to keep US companies in the exploration business.

Are you saying that because prices are up now the rules should be changed in mid stream?

61 posted on 02/17/2006 5:16:55 AM PST by tx_eggman (Islamofascism ... bringing you the best of the 7th century for the past 1300 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson