Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Snows of Kilimanjaro Disappearing (faster rate reported)
TerraDaily ^ | 02/113/2006

Posted on 02/14/2006 9:24:36 AM PST by cogitator

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
Not that this is new news, but it's an update. Things change.
1 posted on 02/14/2006 9:24:37 AM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cogitator

"OHH NOO Mr. Bill that mean Mr. Bush is melting all the snow!"


2 posted on 02/14/2006 9:26:02 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

I care about this because...


3 posted on 02/14/2006 9:27:12 AM PST by VaBthang4 ("He Who Watches Over Israel Will Neither Slumber Nor Sleep")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4

"I care about this because..."

....humanitarian concerns aside, Kofi Annan and our government will surely want them to come here when the wells run dry.


4 posted on 02/14/2006 9:30:31 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really needed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

Isn't Kilimanjaro a volcano? I would be looking for signs of renewed activity before jumping to possible false conclusions.


5 posted on 02/14/2006 9:31:32 AM PST by tertiary01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
The melting of the glaciers on Mt. Kilimanjaro is a simple, local event. The water came from the heavy humidity of forests that USE to surround the mountains, and updrafts brought it up and deposited on the peaks. Natives slash/burned the forests, so the water stopped rising. In this particular case it is 100% explainable and simple to reverse, replant the forests, don't cut them down, and eventually they will grow thicker again.
6 posted on 02/14/2006 9:31:50 AM PST by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

The snow all went to New York City over the weekend.


7 posted on 02/14/2006 9:32:37 AM PST by jpl ("We don't negotiate with terrorists, we put them out of business." - Scott McClellan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

It's hot in Africa near the equator..........or so I've heard.....


8 posted on 02/14/2006 9:34:19 AM PST by Red Badger (...Never forget, Jimmy Carter can be elected president AGAIN!........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tertiary01
Isn't Kilimanjaro a volcano? I would be looking for signs of renewed activity before jumping to possible false conclusions.

That's not the problem. It's mainly a regional climate change phenomenon (another post here described that), perhaps a bit accelerated by higher global temperatures.

9 posted on 02/14/2006 9:36:07 AM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: VaBthang4
I care about this because...

Because "The Snows of Kilimanjaro" are something that have existed through all of human recorded history, and are somewhat famous, and they may not be there in a few years, maybe?

10 posted on 02/14/2006 9:37:27 AM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

I read your posts often. I believe to have a true concern and interest in global climate. I also believe you to be very knowledgeable on the topic without any true political agenda behind it.

I believe that are climate is getting warmer. But, like many on this forum, I have a hard time believing that these events and global warming as a whole is being accelerated by man.

Without going into a novel, what is your opinion of how man may be affecting the climate versus natural forces?


11 posted on 02/14/2006 9:42:02 AM PST by Hayzo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

How soon we forget:

http://www.john-daly.com/press/press-01a.htm#kilimanjaro
About half way down the page are photos showin hardly any snow in 1971, a lot of snow in 1983 and little snow in 1997.

source pictures:
http://www.sharrock.com/safariscrapbook.htm


12 posted on 02/14/2006 9:46:32 AM PST by parcel_of_rogues
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

From that post it sounds like the snows of Kilimanjaro are DEPENDENT on the greenhouse effect.


13 posted on 02/14/2006 9:50:12 AM PST by tertiary01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cogitator
Because "The Snows of Kilimanjaro" are something that have existed through all of human recorded history,

Which in the case of Kilimanjaro only extends to 1848, when a German missionary reported it.

14 posted on 02/14/2006 9:52:01 AM PST by Heyworth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

disappearing glaciers will "add to the heavy drought burden already facing those living near that mountain".

I think it's the other way around. The drought near the mountain is reducing the amount of snow at the peak. It's cold enough up there, but without adequate new snow, the existing pack will evaporate without melting (sublimation). When people read this story, they think "global warming", but even scientists who believe in global warming work with models that predict warming at higher latitudes, not at the equator.


15 posted on 02/14/2006 9:53:13 AM PST by Stirner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

I think the snow went to New York. Must be on vacation.


16 posted on 02/14/2006 10:04:26 AM PST by irishtenor (At 270 pounds, I am twice the bike rider Lance is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

You win the cigar, sir.


17 posted on 02/14/2006 10:10:28 AM PST by Straight Vermonter (John 6: 31-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

Good, more water for crops.


18 posted on 02/14/2006 10:24:19 AM PST by boomop1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Abathar

So what we need to do is instead of sending aid that seldom reaches those that truly need it we need to get to planting trees.


19 posted on 02/14/2006 10:29:35 AM PST by Dustbunny (Life is what happens while you are busy making other plans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dustbunny
In all honesty yes, it would help more than most things they get.
The problem is that some of the ice is so old that it could take thousands of years to replace what a few dozen years of melt can do. Basically the ice is formed by water picked up over the high humid forests, almost like lake effect snow is formed here. The natives have done so much damage to the forests that they better start getting their water from somewhere else when the glaciers completely melt, for mother nature it might be a blink of the eye to replace them but to Hajiji and his family it will be several lifetimes.
20 posted on 02/14/2006 10:36:32 AM PST by Abathar (Proudly catching hell for posting without reading since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson