To: Clintonfatigued; AuH2ORepublican; William Creel; Clemenza; JohnnyZ
The race is starting to tighten up and the poll numbers are looking a bit more realistic. The 25% lead that Nelson had in some earlier polls was ludicrous. I still believe that it will probably be a 55%-45% win for Nelson, unless our side can absolutely demolish Nelson's faux "moderate" persona that the voters seem to believe he has. We have little choice but to go major-league negative if Harris is to have a shot at all.
32 posted on
02/14/2006 5:24:29 PM PST by
fieldmarshaldj
(Cheney X -- Destroying the Liberal Democrat Traitors By Any Means Necessary -- Ya Dig ? Sho 'Nuff.)
To: fieldmarshaldj
Semi-Rant on:
Why is pointing out an opponent's voting record going negative? I think saying someone molests collies is negative, saying they voted to raise your taxes and extend the AWB, for example is merely highlighting what they have been up to doing the job you sent them to do. I also think the conservatives in general and the GOP in particular have got to quit letting ourselves be defined by the other side everyone points at negative campaigning, I seldom agree that what they are raising as negative is an example of negative. The truth hurts some times but politics is not for the faint of heart.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson