Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mase
An overall rating of 90% looks good on paper (Gun control, tax cuts, pro business) but looking at the issues she voted against the ACU recommendations tells me she likes to use federal funds for her pet projects. Hence a moderate/conservative.

Seems the Senate is filled with them already, why do we need another pork ridden politician?

Also as long as Harris supports policies of envirowackos she will always be a moderate. How can a free market conservative support legislation to lock up the gathering of natural resources forever? Harris should side with conservation, not extremism.

You never did explain this page.

http://www.electharris.org/issues/

Preserving SS, wealth distribution, increase funding for an already bloated educational system, siding with environmentalist extremist etc... all screams moderate.

I would never vote for Nelson. Like I said I might vote for Harris but she is not for limited government and energy dependence even though she agrees to drill in ANOTHER state. Pretty gutless if you ask me but like you believe, must sacrifice principles, which means succumbing to more spending and envirowackism so we can "win".
155 posted on 02/18/2006 7:18:12 AM PST by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]


To: rollo tomasi
An overall rating of 90% looks good on paper

You really don't understand the ACU, do you?

tells me she likes to use federal funds for her pet projects. Hence a moderate/conservative.

Yes, she supports spending taxpayer funds for supporting the arts. Not something I support but she does represent the arts capital of Florida so it's not difficult to understand why she does so.

why do we need another pork ridden politician?

You won't get an anti-arts senator with Harris but you will get someone who supports conservative justices to all federal courts, tax cuts, a strong military, family values and a strong foreign policy that involves eliminating islamofascism wherever it exists. You'd ignore all those important facts because she spends to support the arts and won't commit political suicide by voting for drilling off the coast? Now who's being extremist?

Also as long as Harris supports policies of envirowackos

I guess we just define our terms differently.

Preserving SS, wealth distribution, increase funding for an already bloated educational system, siding with environmentalist extremist etc... all screams moderate.

Inferring all that nonsense from her website screams right wing wacko third-party agenda.

Pretty gutless if you ask me but like you believe, must sacrifice principles, which means succumbing to more spending and envirowackism so we can "win".

Gutless? More proof that you have no idea what you're talking about - as if we needed it. Anyone who posts to a thread on KH should at least understand what happened here during the 2000 election. If you did you would use better judgment and refrain from calling her that name which only serves to remove all doubt about your ignorance.

You should probably spend more time on the threads involving Pat Buchanan and other assorted third-party types. There, you'll find many others who share your passion for perfection and getting nothing you want. Like liberals, they believe that you can and should get everything you want and that compromise is something that should never occur in politics. They are an unhappy lot who want power in the worst way but can never seem to obtain any. Lots of bitterness and scorn. You'll feel right at home.

161 posted on 02/20/2006 7:09:18 AM PST by Mase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson