Posted on 02/14/2006 8:59:28 AM PST by Neville72
You really don't understand the ACU, do you?
tells me she likes to use federal funds for her pet projects. Hence a moderate/conservative.
Yes, she supports spending taxpayer funds for supporting the arts. Not something I support but she does represent the arts capital of Florida so it's not difficult to understand why she does so.
why do we need another pork ridden politician?
You won't get an anti-arts senator with Harris but you will get someone who supports conservative justices to all federal courts, tax cuts, a strong military, family values and a strong foreign policy that involves eliminating islamofascism wherever it exists. You'd ignore all those important facts because she spends to support the arts and won't commit political suicide by voting for drilling off the coast? Now who's being extremist?
Also as long as Harris supports policies of envirowackos
I guess we just define our terms differently.
Preserving SS, wealth distribution, increase funding for an already bloated educational system, siding with environmentalist extremist etc... all screams moderate.
Inferring all that nonsense from her website screams right wing wacko third-party agenda.
Pretty gutless if you ask me but like you believe, must sacrifice principles, which means succumbing to more spending and envirowackism so we can "win".
Gutless? More proof that you have no idea what you're talking about - as if we needed it. Anyone who posts to a thread on KH should at least understand what happened here during the 2000 election. If you did you would use better judgment and refrain from calling her that name which only serves to remove all doubt about your ignorance.
You should probably spend more time on the threads involving Pat Buchanan and other assorted third-party types. There, you'll find many others who share your passion for perfection and getting nothing you want. Like liberals, they believe that you can and should get everything you want and that compromise is something that should never occur in politics. They are an unhappy lot who want power in the worst way but can never seem to obtain any. Lots of bitterness and scorn. You'll feel right at home.
Isn't that the best part of being a third-party advocate? You never have to worry about compromising because you'll never have any power. It's easy to stand on the sidelines and criticize when you never had the opportunity, or ability, to play the game.
The unappeasables here regularly claim that they won't be voting republican any more nor will they send any of their hard earned money to the RNC. It's funny to see folks make those kinds of claims when they have been third-party voters and general malcontents most of their adult lives. The perfect candidate (and world) is only attainable in their imaginations which is where, apparently, they choose to live.
Malcontents preach principles but have none in practice. Much easier that way. Trash indeed.
LOL! I was just typing something quite similar on another thread. Gotta ping you to it.
The word has to be got out that Nelson is no moderate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.