[muawiyah]

I'm simply trying to demonstrate that all of the evidence you mustered regarding the word "kind" is ephemeral and without substance.

That doesn't mean you didn't mean well, but you misrepresented the facts.

What kind of scientist does that?

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"I'm simply trying to demonstrate that all of the evidence you mustered regarding the word "kind" is ephemeral and without substance."

You've failed miserably.

"That doesn't mean you didn't mean well, but you misrepresented the facts."

No, that would have been you. You tried to show that since the word *kind* appeared in peer review scientific articles (in a totally trivial and non scientific way), that meant that *kind* was a legitimate taxonomic term. This is insulting to anybody with an IQ over 10. The word *the* appears too, but it is not a meaningful taxonomic term. You have showed NOBODY using the term as meaningful taxonomic definition.

"I see them in the school yard playground about once a month demonstrating they can crossbreed and produce fertile offspring ~ which is certainly a test of critters being in the SAME SPECIES"

They are not the same species. A chihuahua will not breed with a wolf.