[lOKKI]

I've come to the conclusion that this we are seeing the beginning of the next world war - as inevitable as the WW I became.

In that case it was triggered by the (surprisingly similar) anarchist movement which had no center that could be attacked or removed - a movement like as the islamist movement.

There were more than a dozen assassinations of world leaders before the Arch Duke Ferdinand's killing triggered the events that began the war. (Recall President McKinley).
Because the movement had no 'leaders' or central organization, it was impossible to stamp out.

The only thing that ended it was the exhaustion caused by WW I.

Here I tend to believe that the only thing that will end the problems with the Islamist movement is War with Iran, and (no doubt) their ally Syria.

I don't think this will happen tomorrow, but I've come to believe that it's ultimately unavoidable. How do you otherwise stop this clash of civilizations, except by war?

[blam]

"Here I tend to believe that the only thing that will end the problems with the Islamist movement is War with Iran, and (no doubt) their ally Syria."

I agree...and, the sooner the better.

[magslinger]

I believe that you are pretty much right except this war shouldn't be WWIII but WWZERO, because it has been going on against western civilization, with intermissions when the Muslims got beat back a little, for fourteen hundred years.