Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Defiant
Maybe we need a good impeachment, of someone who has admitted that he does NOT follow the Constitution in his rulings. Paging Justice Breyer.
Sure.

Just as soon as you win 67 senate seats for Republicans - not counting any RINOs.

The truth is that there are more than 3 branches of government; journalism arranged the threatened impeachment which induced President Nixon to resign - and did not do so when x42 was in the dock. And journalism sets the stage for the actions of the Supreme Court. Whatever journalism will scorn, most Supreme Court justices will tend to eshew.

And that "fourth branch" is really the only reason that the left has any political strength at all.


16 posted on 02/13/2006 1:30:47 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Obviously, impeaching a justice for admitting that they don't follow the Constitution strictly is not something that would be politically possible today, even with 67 Republicans in the Senate. That's why I say we need to educate the public on what the Constitution actually says and means, and create conditions that allow it to be followed. Socialists did that, spending decades after 1932 laying the groundwork for things like Miranda, Roe v. Wade, and Kelo.


19 posted on 02/13/2006 2:28:49 PM PST by Defiant (DhUmmitude: A simultaneous fear of Bush spying and offending Islamic fanatics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson