Posted on 02/13/2006 5:31:21 AM PST by az4vlad
I always thought of her as the person behind the mask of Bill. He was the puppet that would go out and sing and dance for the people while she pulled the strings
I do believe you're right about that. Can you imagine Bill as the new "first lady"?
So if he was First Lady would that make he and his wife Co-lesbians?
Media reports that she has been trying to position herself more to the middle are simply incorrect.Close. Media reports about 'She Who Shall Not Be Named' are simply her fellow travelers and willing accomplices trying to position her in the best possible way for the uninformed electorate. Anyone with any clue to the bigger picture (even liberals) knows she is a sham. This is why the blue-voters in NY elected her; they have no clue.
How do you figure Rice is a moderate?
"How to Beat Hillary in 2008"
Ignore her until she does something that borders on centrist than hammer her and force her back to the left.
The only viable Democrat ticket in 2008 is Warner/Richardson and that is only if the RATS can take congress in 2006. New Mexico and Virginia going Blue will make it a tie because no Democrat is going to take a Red state and they will have to fight to hold their Blue states.
"She is assured to win the Democratic primary"
NOT SO. At one time, maybe, but the Kennedy/Kerry wing of the Democrat Party will make an all out effort to stop her. Besides, the kook-fringe of the Dem Party is the one that votes in the Primaries and she is not popular with them b/c of her position on the Iraq war.
No shoo in, she.
Who is your GOP Choice for '08 Colonel? Just curious.
Don't worry 'bout 2008. Worry 'bout 2006. As long as conservatives hold both houses of Congress (which, at this time, I don't think we really do... to many RINOs), it doesn't matter that much who the president is...
The best choices appear to be one of the following, in no particular order:
Senator Allen of Virginia, Governor Huckabee of Arkansas, Senator Frist of Tennessee, or Governor Barbour of Mississippi.
Senator Allen is my man, at this point.
I think we should refer to piaps as America's EX-wife. She is hideous!! That gets the message across. hahaha!
what a nag, what a hag, what a b!tch!!
How to beat the screaching evil windbag? Simple. Just put her on the balot.
Senator Allen I agree with. Huckabee I like but probably not electable. Barbour is probably a little to "back woodsy" for most Americans. Frist has become such a political whore of late by deliberately distancing himself from the Prez to try and appeal to Moderate Repuplicans and Dems. As a matter-of-fact, there was a segment about his "whoredoms" on Fox News yesterday. Many of us had already picked up on it before however.
George Allen? Yeah. I'll go for that.
Well, how would you classify Condileeza Rice ?
No one knows anything about her politics, outside of foreign affairs.
Does anyone know where she stands on taxation, immigration, affirmative action, medicare/social security reform, tort reform, Supreme Court nominees, strict constructionism ? If so, I'd love a dissertation.
Until a Republican states firm conservative positions, I automatically assume that they tend to have left-of-center leanings.
It has proven to almost always be a safe assumption.
(vanity)
A non-achieving political opportunist can attain great heights is today's dumbed-down culture. She or he can (through shrewdness) actually project the image of "brilliance", without ever having to demonstrate or prove it. The trick is to get others to do it. It requires a large malcontent body, an adoring, obsequious press, along with dysfunctional political sycophants who have abandonded any measure of self-respect in order to curry favor of someone who displays a ruthlessness that both frightens and fascinates them (a psychological aberration that can only bring harm to others, if it helps bring the charlatan to power).
The myth is perpetrated further by said clever advisors, who circumvent the usual channels of verification of this (or anyone's) "superior intelligence", and who arrange for the subject to appear at pre-orchestrated forums in such a way as to protect them from any kind of scrutiny--lest it expose the fraud.
Add to this the unconditional surrender of intellectual curiosity of those who, instead, will weep actual tears over the pretender's banal, insipid utterances, and the hoax is complete.
There is truly something vulgar about all of this. It is, at the very least, contemptuous of what most of us feel- that which we were grought up to believe in- honesty, forthrightness, sincerity, and having the courage to state what you actually believe in and having the chips fall where they may.
We deserve more, even if it means disturbing the fairy tales of others.
The way to beat hillary in '08 is to have the Army re-design the ACU to include a velcro fastening at the back of the trousers. To allow for the easier opening and closijng for homosexual activities in the fox-hole.
"How to Beat Hillary in 2008"
Just use her own words and actions over the last 30 years against her. Any chance of someone unearthing her thesis that was sealed prior to BJC's first presidential run? The speculation out there is that it reads something like the Communist Manifesto, with a hint of feminism.
Kerry got blown out of the water when the Vets pointed out some of his history, and he was nowhere near as polarizing a figure as Hillary.
If she is going to move forward with presidential run, she will most likely do so with the complete knowledge that the DNC will pull out all the stops to steal the election.
My choice too
She may not be perfect but as close as you can get
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.