Ranchers pleased, enviros unhappy
Don't you just love it when the good guys win???
1 posted on
02/12/2006 10:42:50 AM PST by
SandRat
To: HiJinx; Spiff; idratherbepainting; AZHSer; Sabertooth; Marine Inspector; A Navy Vet; ...
Ranchers win one and the Watermelons lose one. I like that arrangement.
2 posted on
02/12/2006 10:43:53 AM PST by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
To: SandRat
"Some guy locked up in an office, what does he know about what's happening out here?"
Absolutely-100%-of-NOTHING.
3 posted on
02/12/2006 10:48:16 AM PST by
ExcursionGuy84
("Jesus, Your Love takes my breath away.")
To: SandRat
This reads more like a pork issue than an environmental one. Another $125 million a year towards the largest federal government in history. Great news.
4 posted on
02/12/2006 11:05:48 AM PST by
CGTRWK
To: SandRat
To: freepatriot32
To: SandRat
*On March 1, the federal fee charged for grazing Forest Service and BLM land will drop from $1.79 to $1.56. I don't care how much it went down, I want to know what the federal parasites do with it.
Do they plant more grasslands, remodel Senators' offices or send it to the Palestinian terrorists?
13 posted on
02/12/2006 3:00:19 PM PST by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government "job" attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
To: SandRat
Sorry but I gotta disgree with you here SR. Why are we the taxpayers subsidizing a bunch of private businessmen who happen to raise cattle?
I favor selling the land outright to the highest bidder and letting the free market sort it out.
L
14 posted on
02/12/2006 3:02:01 PM PST by
Lurker
(In God I trust. Everybody else shows me their hands.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson