To: fallujah-nuker; JasonC
"Any new bomber should be both conventional and nuclear capable. It would also have more uses than China and would fit into a policy of "disproportionate response" when we decide to take off the gloves in dealing with the Islamderthals."
I think we should back out of the INF Treaty as well. It'll give us maximum flexibility in neutron-weapons use. Besides, Russia will need them too once China stabs them in the back and goes after all of those natural resources.
14 posted on
02/12/2006 8:11:55 PM PST by
neutronsgalore
(Why are free-traders so blind to the assistance they’re providing our enemies?)
To: neutronsgalore
I think we should back out of the INF Treaty as well. It'll give us maximum flexibility in neutron-weapons use. Besides, Russia will need them too once China stabs them in the back and goes after all of those natural resources.
We should also build up our own ICBM force. No need to design a new ICBM, the Minuteman can be put back into production. The peanut farmer shut the line down in 1977 as a gesture of friendship to the USSR. They replied by cranking out SS-18's.
A Minuteman could be much improved just by the advances in technology such as Alithalite castings, better guidance and improved warheads to give them improved payload/range. Personally I like adding range, perhaps North Dakota to Mecca and Medina?
16 posted on
02/12/2006 8:21:21 PM PST by
fallujah-nuker
(America needs more SAC and less empty sacs.)
To: neutronsgalore
Why am I being pinged here? I have not participated in this thread, nor expressed any desire to be pinged on such matters. Please refrain from unsolicited pings. Thanks.
17 posted on
02/13/2006 5:24:12 AM PST by
JasonC
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson