Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senator changes mind on Schiavo [Martinez - FL]
The St. Petersburg Times ^ | 2/12/06 | ADAM C. SMITH

Posted on 02/12/2006 6:25:57 AM PST by doc30

Sen. Mel Martinez, nearly a year after leading the charge for federal intervention in the Terri Schiavo case, now says he may have been off-base.

"Perhaps this was not in the realm of federal concern. It may have been better left to state courts to deal with it," Martinez said in a taped interview for Political Connections that airs today on Bay News 9.

In a wide-ranging interview in which the Orlando Republican for the first time also publicly embraced the Senate candidacy of Katherine Harris, he alluded to the Schiavo controversy as providing a lesson "with a whack across the head."

Martinez was the Senate's point person pushing a bill to give federal courts jurisdiction in the case as part of an effort to force the brain-damaged Pinellas County woman's feeding tubes to be reinserted.

The effort to keep her alive proved unsuccessful and enormously unpopular with the public. It was particularly damaging to Martinez after it turned out his legal counsel had drafted a memo describing the Schiavo legislation as "a great political issue." That aide left Martinez's staff.

"I've enjoyed the year. There are moments of learning, sometimes with a whack across the head," he said when asked about lessons he'd learned in his year in the Senate. "You know exactly what I'm talking about. Staff members that don't quite do what you want them to do, and then big problems develop. You learn from those things and you move on."

Martinez has previously stood by his role in the Schiavo controversy, but his latest comments come two weeks after Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist recounted the lessons he learned from the Schiavo controversy: "The American people don't want you involved in these decisions."

Martinez said supporters of the bill wanted "one last measure of review. That's what the debate was about in the Senate. If I had to take one lesson away it's perhaps decisions of this nature really belong in state courts, not federal courts."

Political Connections is a joint venture between the St. Petersburg Times and Bay News 9, and it airs at 11 a.m. Starting Monday, the interview can be seen on channel 340 (Tampa Bay on Demand).

Martinez also touted the bill he and Democratic Sen. Bill Nelson are sponsoring to enact permanent restrictions on offshore drilling within 150 miles of Florida, even as he said he ultimately will campaign against Nelson, who faces a challenge from Republican Rep. Harris of Sarasota.

"The beauty of it is that (Nelson) and I are working together as Floridians, working side by side on something that's good for Florida. But there's no question that I'm a Republican and I want to support my party's nominee for senator," said Martinez, adding that "politics will come later."

While prominent Republicans for months had been unenthusiastic about Harris' candidacy, fearing she will lose, Martinez for the first time publicly promised he'll campaign for Harris.

"I don't see anyone else out there even thinking or talking about it. So I think she is the candidate. I think she'll be the nominee of our party and I think she'll acquit herself well. She's a fighter, she's a dogged person that I think will demonstrate to Floridians that she'll be a good candidate," he said.

Martinez narrowly beat Democrat Betty Castor in 2004 in a race in which former University of South Florida professor Sami Al-Arian was a central issue. Al-Arian was suspected of financing terrorism while Castor was president of USF, and Martinez criticized her for not taking more decisive action against Al-Arian.

In December, a federal jury found Al-Arian not guilty on eight counts and a judge declared a mistrial on nine others. Despite that, Martinez said he had no regrets about making an issue out of Al-Arian, calling it a "managerial" question and noting that the Castor campaign itself first brought up Al-Arian in the general election.

"I don't have any second thoughts about it. I think it was a valid issue, but I think at this point the legal process isn't through with it, and I would anticipate that there may even be further prosecutions," Martinez said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: 109th; ban; drilling; florida; harris; martinez; melmartinez; schaivo; senate; terrischiavo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
Any comments on the Junior Senator from FL? Don't mean to open the Schaivo story, but Martinez working with Nelson on the oil drilling ban really bothers me. Seems Martinez may be a new member of the RINO club. Please tell me I'm wrong on that.
1 posted on 02/12/2006 6:25:58 AM PST by doc30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: doc30

Florida Repubicans could have done MUCH better than Mel Martinez for senator. He and Nelson are two peas in a pod.


2 posted on 02/12/2006 6:27:50 AM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc30

You just HAD to post this, didn't you? :)


3 posted on 02/12/2006 6:30:27 AM PST by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc30

comments? sure. let us murder you, so then we can apologize to your corpse. what a clown this rino is.


4 posted on 02/12/2006 6:32:31 AM PST by son of caesar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc30
Martinez working with Nelson on the oil drilling ban really bothers me. Seems Martinez may be a new member of the RINO club. Please tell me I'm wrong on that.

He's caught my attention also, not in a good way...


5 posted on 02/12/2006 6:34:54 AM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc30

Must be worried about re-election. That's one of the best indicators when they flip flop. They are in it for their own benefit, no one elses......ever.


6 posted on 02/12/2006 6:35:53 AM PST by b4its2late (Terrorists will either succeed in changing our way of life, or we will change theirs. - Rummy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc30
I have little to say about Señor Senator Martinez other than he must have a terrible staff, as the delay from writing him and the eventual standard reply, is long in coming.

It would appear that he is on schedule to be a one term senator.





7 posted on 02/12/2006 6:36:23 AM PST by G.Mason (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc30
He is on course to be a one-term Senator in large part because people in Florida were furious that he believed the federal government should be making life-and-death decisions for individuals rather than their families.

Man, you "conservatives" sure have made your peace with exercising unlimited governmental power, eh? You know what they say about power. And there's no better proof than to look at the Republican party of 1984 or 1994 and the cesspool it is today.

8 posted on 02/12/2006 6:50:14 AM PST by Jonathon Spectre (Nazis believed they were doing good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonathon Spectre

Why is it so awful to have the federal government intervention in family matters and not the state government, and a state official so compromised by his relationship with the attorney on one side of the case? So many people focused so much on the principle of states rights and so little on the principle of judicial impartiality in matters of life and death. No point, of course, in revisiting the matter, It was well established that the principle of utility dominates the conservative movement. Unless the person is useful, he is worthless.


9 posted on 02/12/2006 7:00:56 AM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jonathon Spectre

civil rights are a federal issue.


10 posted on 02/12/2006 7:13:34 AM PST by conservative physics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: doc30

This is probably the only matter in history which the liberals think should have been decided by the states...


11 posted on 02/12/2006 7:24:00 AM PST by SeƱor Zorro ("The ability to speak does not make you intelligent"--Qui-Gon Jinn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc30
Martinez said supporters of the bill wanted "one last measure of review. That's what the debate was about in the Senate. If I had to take one lesson away it's perhaps decisions of this nature really belong in state courts, not federal courts."

Condemned prisoners get federal judicial review on top of their state review. The governor of the state also has the power to grant clemency.

This is all that was asked when a person's blood relatives disagree with the spouse's decision to end a life. We're going to err on the side of keeping people alive when the correct course is uncertain.

Not exactly an earth shattering concept. But apparently beyond the intellectual capacity of Sen. Martinez.

12 posted on 02/12/2006 8:30:40 AM PST by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc30

-The effort to keep her alive proved unsuccessful and enormously unpopular with the public.-

That should be "unpopular with the uninformed public", and they were uninformed because the media misinformed them with the use of the term "vegetable".


13 posted on 02/12/2006 8:42:52 AM PST by AmericanChef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc30
Mel Martinez had the support of the Bushes and they are good at political game playing.

It's a complex puzzle. The Bushes fraternize with the Clintons and it's one big happy oligarchy.

14 posted on 02/12/2006 9:20:10 AM PST by floriduh voter (http://www.conservative-spirit.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanChef; 8mmMauser; T'wit; Dante3
The propaganda by the mainstream media contributed to her death. Hard to believe how many people were brainwashed but I recall that there was a FR survey in which 87 - 89% of freepers voted that Terri should get to live. Why don't freepers recall that poll?

They shouldn't be writing about Terri any more. So many more people are being killed the same way without the headlines. She had no directives. She was murdered.

15 posted on 02/12/2006 9:23:11 AM PST by floriduh voter (http://www.conservative-spirit.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: floriduh voter
Exactly. And an incredible amount of misinformation has been spread about this case.

The fact is that Terri never indicated she wanted to die, much less be dehydrated. She never had a lawyer, and Greer denied her due process while catering to Michael Schiavo. The sadistic students Michael pulled on her and her family is too long to list.

16 posted on 02/12/2006 9:43:24 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: bvw
sarcasm....


19 posted on 02/12/2006 9:55:34 AM PST by darkwing104 (Let's get dangerous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104

Sorry ... thanks to teh quick moderators my most intemparate post was pulled.


20 posted on 02/12/2006 9:57:27 AM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson