Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: goldstategop
Still the President could have just invoked the Fifth.

The fifth ammendment applies only to criminal cases.

You cannot refuse to answer questions in a civil case. If you refuse to answer, the answer is deemed to be whatever the opposition wants it to be.

39 posted on 02/11/2006 8:22:12 PM PST by Dan(9698)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Dan(9698)
The truth would have been politically embarrassing but not as bad as being impeached for breaking the country's laws. That was Clinton's choice and at the moment of truth, he lied, figuring he would never get caught. After all, I never ever had sex with that woman.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

40 posted on 02/11/2006 8:25:51 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson