Skip to comments.
Boy charged with felony for carrying sugar
suntimes ^
| February 11, 2006
Posted on 02/11/2006 4:11:34 PM PST by Revel
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 661-663 next last
To: mysterio
"So you are against charging a kid for possession of sugar? For or against? Which is it?"School policy aside, I'm for charging the kid with the crime committed. He was charged with violating the Illinois Controlled Substances Act, 720 ILCS 570/404(b), unlawful distribution of a look-alike substance, a Class 3 felony.
I doubt, however, that they can make that charge stick. Because of that, I feel they should drop the charge to violating the Illinois Controlled Substances Act, 720 ILCS 570/404(c), unlawful possession of a look-alike substance, a petty offense.
To: muawiyah
I can tell lactose by taste.Mixed with cocaine.
282
posted on
02/12/2006 1:45:15 PM PST
by
Mojave
To: robertpaulsen
another thing I thought about with this case is if the child is convicted it will go on his record as a drug crime and that means he loses all financial aid to attend college under the Higher Education Act's drug provision wich means you will be supporting him financial for the rest of his life with your tax money when he has to go on welfare because he cant get a job worth having with no college education
if he had shot the kid that ask him if he had coke on him when he got out of prison he would be able to get all the financial aid he wanted to attend college.Does that seem just a touch bass achwards to you?Or do you like the idea of him not ever having a shot of going to college if he is convicted of having sugar when there are rapist and child molester that are in college right now getting student aid that he will never be eligible for?
283
posted on
02/12/2006 1:51:10 PM PST
by
freepatriot32
(Holding you head high & voting Libertarian is better then holding your nose and voting republican)
To: freepatriot32
It's strike one on the three strikes counter.
284
posted on
02/12/2006 2:20:41 PM PST
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch ist der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: robertpaulsen
Got an answer?I already gave you the answer. If you don't like the answer, that is not my problem.
To: robertpaulsen
He was charged with violating the Illinois Controlled Substances Act, 720 ILCS 570/404(b), unlawful distribution of a look-alike substance, a Class 3 felony.So, this law is a pile of BS, but you advocate enforcing it to the full extent anyway?
Very informative..and scary.
To: elkfersupper
"So, this law is a pile of BS, but you advocate enforcing it to the full extent anyway?"I already gave you the answer. If you don't like the answer, that is not my problem
To: robertpaulsen
Cleverness does not necessarily beget cleverness.
To: B Knotts
The police, prosecutor and school "officials" need to be involuntarily committed to an insane asylum ASAP. Hey, not so fast there!
They ought to be given the opportunity to go voluntarily. If they decline the offer, well, then go round 'em up. :)
289
posted on
02/12/2006 3:50:14 PM PST
by
Don Joe
(We've traded the Rule of Law for the Law of Rule.)
To: robertpaulsen
School policy aside, I'm for charging the kid with the crime committed. He was charged with violating the Illinois Controlled Substances Act, 720 ILCS 570/404(b), unlawful distribution of a look-alike substance, a Class 3 felony.
So you're for it. What's the problem? I didn't misrepresent your unthinking fanaticism. You want to throw a kid in jail for having a bag of sugar because it kind of looks like coke. That's insane. You hate drug users so much that you are insane.
You're a one man lollerfest. And Mojave is just the icing on the cake.
To: wintertime
"Where is this boy's dad?"
Probably up the river for twenty in Joliet...
...for dealing Karo syrup as freebase.
291
posted on
02/12/2006 4:30:47 PM PST
by
LibertarianInExile
(Freedom isn't free--no, there's a hefty f'in fee--and if you don't throw in your buck-o-5, who will?)
To: SoftballMominVA
"What? you have 2 canisters on your counter, one marked cocaine and one marked sugar and he grabbed the wrong one?"
ROFLMAO! Wish I could have seen her face.
292
posted on
02/12/2006 4:32:53 PM PST
by
LibertarianInExile
(Freedom isn't free--no, there's a hefty f'in fee--and if you don't throw in your buck-o-5, who will?)
To: Mojave; mysterio
"Well, pin a rose on you."
As long as you don't pin a felony on him as a result. That rose could be a look-alike drug for poppies, and we don't want any look-alike-heroin addicts on FR.
293
posted on
02/12/2006 4:35:01 PM PST
by
LibertarianInExile
(Freedom isn't free--no, there's a hefty f'in fee--and if you don't throw in your buck-o-5, who will?)
To: mysterio
"They sell little baggies one isle over. I think we can make the connection. It's time to nail the Kroger cartel once and for all."
You know you're going to be inciting some prosecutor to bust Kroger for possession of drug paraphernalia now, doncha? The Feds could use a supermarket chain to go with their cathouse and powerboat fleet.
294
posted on
02/12/2006 4:37:41 PM PST
by
LibertarianInExile
(Freedom isn't free--no, there's a hefty f'in fee--and if you don't throw in your buck-o-5, who will?)
To: robertpaulsen; Mojave
This little bugger is putting fake cocaine on his cheerios! That's a life sentence!!! You brownshirts should join your DEA goon buddies and kick his door in tonight!
Check out the look on his face. Junkie for sure!
To: LibertarianInExile
I betcha Walmart moves tons of fake drugs. I nominate paulsen and Mojave to crack some skulls!
To: robertpaulsen
The kid didn't "distribute" it. So he's not guilty of that charge.
But the cafeteria workers all need to be put away for life!
297
posted on
02/12/2006 4:47:53 PM PST
by
Nova
To: mysterio
Look at this. I mean will you just look at this? Marketed to CHILDREN!!!! PAULSEN AND I STAND UNITED AGAINST YOUR FAKE COCAINE, PUSHERMAN!!!
To: dufekin
"Another principle tells us that in a fight between a bully and victim, the victim must receive a stronger punishment for being bullied than the bully. This principle mainly protects bullies, gangs, and drug dealers who operate on school property, thus creating a haven for juvenile delinquents and other criminals." I've always liked that latter one. "No fighting" because "fighting" is always bad, even in self-defense, m'kay? Why? Because it's bad, m'kay, and we can't have bad things in school, m'kay?
299
posted on
02/12/2006 4:52:30 PM PST
by
LibertarianInExile
(Freedom isn't free--no, there's a hefty f'in fee--and if you don't throw in your buck-o-5, who will?)
To: mysterio
FAKE HEROIN!!!! YEAH, SURE YOU'RE MAKING GRAVY, GRANDMA!!!!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280, 281-300, 301-320 ... 661-663 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson