1 posted on
02/11/2006 2:35:33 PM PST by
Coleus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
To: Calpernia; SandRat
2 posted on
02/11/2006 2:35:45 PM PST by
Coleus
(IMHO, The IVF procedure is immoral & kills many embryos/children and should be outlawed)
To: Coleus
Mecca assured destruction. MAD.
4 posted on
02/11/2006 2:40:59 PM PST by
Paladin2
(If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
To: Coleus
This is raw stock tooting by Sixty Minutes. 100,000 acute cases of rad posioning is a lot more than small nuclear device would deliver even if set off in Union City NJ -- imo.
6 posted on
02/11/2006 2:41:44 PM PST by
bvw
To: Coleus
SHUUUUUUUSH!! CBS....your scaring Hilderbeast
8 posted on
02/11/2006 2:42:20 PM PST by
Doogle
(USAF...8thAF...4077th TFW...408th MMS...Ubon Thailand..."69"..Night Line Delivery,AMMO)
To: Coleus; Chieftain
Am I sure I want to be 'saved" and be around for what follows in this country after an attack? What a F...g nitemare. And our congress is just a ship of Fools. I am so depressed I am going out to get ice cream.
9 posted on
02/11/2006 2:42:56 PM PST by
Recovering Ex-hippie
(I am soooo sick of Oprah!!!! Oprah, STFU !)
To: Coleus
Democrats and a few Republicans are hell-bent on welcoming this kind of calamity!
It's not fair listening to the terrorists' cell phone calls.
Why doesn't Congress just make a law requiring every other American to be beheaded by Christmas!?
10 posted on
02/11/2006 2:44:26 PM PST by
CROSSHIGHWAYMAN
(expell the fat arrogant carcasses of Congress)
To: Coleus
11 posted on
02/11/2006 2:44:52 PM PST by
Alexander Rubin
(Octavius - You make my heart glad building thus, as if Rome is to be eternal.)
To: Coleus
>Thats because the Pentagon after decades of searching believes it has found a drug to treat radiation exposure. Why isnt that drug available?
So, the Pentagon
knocks on your door, and they want
to give you a shot.
How many Freepers
are gonna roll up their sleeves
and get injected?!
To: Coleus
Even the worst case scenario isn't all that bad...
1) Muslims nuke a major city (most are predominantly democratic bastions)
2) The attack results in fewer DUmmies to steal elections/cause crime/murder the unborn/vote for socialists/live off the government teat.
3) We "honor their memory" by nuking Mecca.
I can live with that.
14 posted on
02/11/2006 2:47:23 PM PST by
Triggerhippie
(Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose.)
To: Coleus
I suggest they hit San Francisco, Vermont, or Massataxus.
To: Coleus
Yeah, but for Howard Dean and the rest of the DefeatoCrats, the "Worst Case Scenario" is really the "Best Case Scenario" because a nuclear terrorist attack opens up the door to all sorts of political opportunities in which the 'Rats can blame the Republican Party for a "miserable failure" (thank YOU Dick Gephardt) in allowing such an attack to take place, you can bet your last dime that while Red Cross teams are trying to save lives, the 'Rat Party will be trying to assess their chances for seizing power at the earliest opportunity.
Cynical? Not at all. This is based on the proven behavior of the Wellstoners and King "mourners" who have demonstrated what their priorities are.
16 posted on
02/11/2006 2:50:51 PM PST by
mkjessup
(The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
To: Coleus
18 posted on
02/11/2006 2:53:16 PM PST by
sono
(Ted Kennedy's naming his dog Splash is like Jack Abramoff naming his dog Bribe.)
To: Coleus
"We can no longer ignore the worst-case scenario of a nuclear terrorist attack on an American city."
Hmmmmm... I don't think the rest of us have been doing that. Only the media and the Congress.
To: Coleus
BUTT CBS, NYT, TWP, ABC, NBC, CNN, LAT, ACLU, Bob Barr and the left wing say we should not monitor the terrorist without a warrant. So we can do nothing if the judge says NO and the enemy is laughing at the idiots who say we cannot monitor them.
DUMB, DUMB, DUMB
20 posted on
02/11/2006 2:57:44 PM PST by
YOUGOTIT
To: Coleus
Maybe I'm an idiot here, but why does the GOVERNMENT need to purchase said drug? Why can't individuals purchase it themselves, through their doctors? Why do we need to go through the government for this? Will Big Brother buy the duct tape for everyone's windows, too?
27 posted on
02/11/2006 3:17:27 PM PST by
Yaelle
(in their effort not to demonize humans, Spielberg and Kushner end up humanizing demons)
To: Coleus
The 9/11 Commission considers such an attack the No. 1 threat today, not because its the most likely disaster scenario, but because it would be the most devastating. I suspect there are things these terrorists could do that would be comparatively destructive to a nuke (and much less costly). The powers that be need to be using their imaginations.
43 posted on
02/11/2006 3:46:26 PM PST by
The Duke
To: Coleus
If
"Red Star Rogue" is correct
The Worst-Case Scenario, a nuclear attack on the US, already happened. On March 7, 1968 a highly placed, but not ruling, renegade clique within the USSR attempted to nuke Pearl Harbor and frame Mao for it. And we thus know what a Democrat President would do in that case. Hide that it ever happened. If the book's reading of what's known is correct we have the foresight of a Republican President to thank for the attack's failure. Thank you, Ike, for leaking fail safe technology in the 50s. It kept 50 stars on the flag. The subsequent Republican President, Nixon, used this as diplomatic leverage against the USSR in general and told Breznev enough so he could pull the clique's teeth.
If the book is correct than now is the time for the secret to become known. So we realize that small groups of powerful nut cases are capable and willing to nuke us. If Yuri Andropov, as the head of the KGB, and his mentor Suslov, the top Soviet ideologue, did it; we can't discount that the head of Iran and their top Mullahs would do it. They might not fail.
To: Coleus
Hundreds of thousand of people could die in a nuclear attack, but hundreds of thousands of others could be saved.Lets concentrate on stopping said nuclear bomb detonating in the first place, and not setting the ground for post nuclear lawyer trust funds.
To: Coleus
Does Ed Bradley hold Hollis-Eden stock?
To: Coleus
Absolute rubbish. Platelets and neutrophils. The same cells physicians worry about following a stem cell transplant or haematopioetic cell transplant. Several drugs (cytokines) have been available for years to stimulate neutrophil and platelet production. A totally bogus story.
Depending upon the degree of radiation you are exposed to there may be absolutely nothing that can be done for you, or, indeed, you may be able to survive with treatment if you only receive a slight degree of radiation.
Want to treat radiation sickness the most effective way??????????????????????????? Turn Iran and Syria into glass NOW!
56 posted on
02/11/2006 4:26:40 PM PST by
Doc Savage
(Of all these things you can be sure, only love...will endure.......................)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson