Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur
Coulter DID oppose John Roberts

"Maybe Roberts will contravene the sordid history of 'stealth nominees' and be the Scalia or Thomas that Bush promised us when he was asking for our votes. Or maybe he won't. The Supreme Court shouldn't be a game of Russian roulette." Ann Coulter

It was fair commentary when she made it.

56 posted on 02/11/2006 4:11:56 PM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: JCEccles

"'Maybe Roberts will contravene the sordid history of 'stealth nominees' and be the Scalia or Thomas that Bush promised us when he was asking for our votes. Or maybe he won't. The Supreme Court shouldn't be a game of Russian roulette.' Ann Coulter

It was fair commentary when she made it."

It's still fair commentary. There's a big ruling brewing on abortion, too, that will settle the issue. I'm hoping for the best, but it's never a dull moment with the GOP SCOTUS nominees.


102 posted on 02/12/2006 7:21:04 AM PST by LibertarianInExile (Freedom isn't free--no, there's a hefty f'in fee--and if you don't throw in your buck-o-5, who will?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: JCEccles
It was fair commentary when she made it.

No it wasn't, it was a pure hit piece. The last sentence you quoted was the only one that cast she had any doubt that Roberts might not be a Souter. Coulter was 100% against Roberts.

107 posted on 02/12/2006 7:30:12 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson