Conservatives remain loyal to Bush but question depth of his conservatism

Las Vegas Sun ^ | February.11, 2006 | WILL LESTER

[DoNotDivide]

I find RINOs more amusing than anything.

[Howlin]

Too chicken *s*t to address me directly I see?

[Howlin]

Is that what you're trying to pass off as intelligent discussion?

[sinkspur]

Ah, yes. Agreeing with Jack Kelly about the knuckle-draggers and their antics.

I plead guilty. Brilliant writing, brilliant analysis, brilliant advice.

But, no racial epithets there. You, I suppose, like Coulter's Muslim "n word" references.

It figures.

[Stellar Dendrite]

"I find RINOs more amusing than anything."

Yes they are, but there are a few "special" individuals not even worth addressing.

[kalee]

I didn't vote for Bush in the primary and I knew he wasn't conservative when I voted for him in the general, but my other option was algore, who wasn't an option.

[DoNotDivide]

Pearls and swine ring a bell?

[DoNotDivide]

I agree. How can there be so many 'tenured' RINOS hovering on FR?

[Howlin]

Pearls and swine ring a bell?

It sure does; it's more meaningless drivel posted by you. We've ALL seen it.

[DoNotDivide]

Speaking of meaningless drivel.

[Howlin]

Speaking of meaningless drivel.

Well, it's good to see you agreeing with me that you're posts are meaningless.

[DoNotDivide]

Last word.

[LK44-40]

I don't question it anymore. He's not reeeeally a genuine political conservative. He's a genuine Christian (though misguided here and there), but his politics is an odd mix of ideologies. He has the "nice guy" philosophy, which can be dangerous. I hope we never again choose a guy without a firm foundation in conservative principles AND philosophy. Bush means well, but he just doesn't always get the big picture.

What ~you~ said, Ghost!

The apple doesn't fall far from the tree. Actually, I think he daddy was "nicer," one of the most genuinely decent fellows I've ever seen in national politics.

But 41, as he said himself, didn't "do the vision thing." That is utterly unacceptable to me as a conservative. And 43 doesn't do it either.

W, though different in style from his dad, is also a non-reflective man. There is a family trait there about physical action being more central to them than thoughtfulness. But one thing I really, really like about W. is that he is not John Kerry or Al Gore. I had no trouble whatsoever taking his side. And he seems to have done great on the SCOTUS, although his impulsive instincts seem to have been to go for people like himself who are not very reflective. That would have been disaster.

[truth_seeker]

"Conservatives question the sanity of those who spend all their time whining at their own side. Wonder why so many supposed Reagan Fans forget his 11th Commandment."

Would you seek to deprive freepers of singing in unison "rino" concerning most Republicans?

A couple of days ago somebody said that Graham was the same as Gore or Kerry.

We ought to have an entrance exam here!!

[sinkspur]

YOU quoting Scripture? BWAAAHAAAA HAAAAAAAA1!!

You're forgiven, though. You've been here a little over a month, so you're still in diapers.

[Howlin]

Last word.

If only we could believe you.

[F16Fighter]

Lol, I guess you proved who was B-sh*tting.

[onyx]

You brat. You're going to get a spanking!

[F16Fighter]

"There's something really sick about a poster who collects other people's posts to use them against them later."

And there's something great about defending the personal charge of "liar." IN SPADES.

As though YOU would accept being called a liar and NOT defend the charge?

[F16Fighter]

You have only yourself to blame you bratty brat!