Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FairOpinion
I don't understand why current mayor of LA was offended that he's not briefed for something that happened in 2002.
2 posted on 02/10/2006 9:25:15 PM PST by paudio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: paudio

But I heard mentioned on TV -- I think Ollie North said that the White House DID call Villaraigosa's office the day before to let him know what's in Bush's speech and apparently his staff didn't tell him.


3 posted on 02/10/2006 9:26:35 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: paudio

It's obvious he was offended because the WH did not tell him that they would be talking about it on National TV without first letting him know. It made him and LA look stupid and frankly, I don't blame him. The WH should have told him they planned on talking about it.


4 posted on 02/10/2006 9:29:22 PM PST by Hildy (The only difference between a rut and a grave is the depth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: paudio
I don't understand why current mayor of LA was offended that he's not briefed for something that happened in 2002.

I was waiting for the breathless wire service article about Governor Schwarzenegger being upset about not being briefed about something that happened a year before he took office.

Maybe Bush should contact all possible future mayors of LA and let them know that there was a plot that was thwarted while one of the predecessors was in office.

7 posted on 02/10/2006 9:31:16 PM PST by Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: paudio
I don't understand why current mayor of LA was offended that he's not briefed for something that happened in 2002.

And not only that he wasn't in office, why should he act surprised? I thought I heard that his Senator Feinstein says it is old news and evil Bush and Rove are just trotting it out again in 2006 to "scare people" into voting for them. Huh? I thought GWB couldn't run again . . . . /sarcasm

9 posted on 02/10/2006 9:34:54 PM PST by p23185
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: paudio

Based on his performance during his televised comments, it was pretty clear to me why the dimwit would be offended. Match a less than stellar intellect with being a member of the Democratic Party, and "Voila", you've an "instant idiot"!!


27 posted on 02/10/2006 10:01:07 PM PST by singfreedom ("Victory at all costs,.......for without victory there is no survival."--Churchill--that's "Winston")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: paudio

Exactly. The current mayor of LA who wasn't in office in 2002, is more interested in making CA part of Mexico than protecting the US.


46 posted on 02/11/2006 7:17:06 AM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson