Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: My2Cents
However, the microphones stayed on for a few minutes. That allowed journalists back at the White House to eavesdrop on Bush's defense of the eavesdropping. His private statements were basically no different from what he's said in public.

And why does the AP consider this news?

Maybe because after covering Clinton for so long, they can't believe that a president would say in public the same thing as he would say privately.

14 posted on 02/10/2006 4:40:35 PM PST by Anti-MSM (Conservatives wish 9-11 never happened-liberals pretend it didn't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Anti-MSM
"Maybe because after covering Clinton for so long, they can't believe that a president would say in public the same thing as he would say privately."

Probably also that every other word was not an expletive.

Of course, talking in expletives probably endears someone to the press.

51 posted on 02/10/2006 5:05:19 PM PST by TheClintons-STILLAnti-American (Keep the adults in charge of Congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Anti-MSM
after covering Clinton for so long, they can't believe that a president would say in public the same thing as he would say privately

Nail...head

53 posted on 02/10/2006 5:06:05 PM PST by Fudd Fan (Sorry Mr. Franklin, but apparently we couldn't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson