Eating out last night, and no alcohol was involved, it became rather clear that evolution is easily disproven by the simple fact that food, and drink, that we enjoy most is bad for us, but food that is best for us, we largely detest. Wouldn't the opposite be true if we had evolved, rather than been divinely created? :^)
Evolution does exist, but it does not explain creation, nor does it explain "quantum leaps" in biological developments.
Current evolutionary theories suggest Shakespeare can be written by random ordering of letters over time, if we simply keep killing off the bad combinations of letters and reproducing a new set of letter combinations using the surviving letter combinations and random bits of new letter sets. But it does not explain how the letters came to exist in the first place, why the letter sets should desire to repoduce at all or how it is determined what combination of letters are good, or which are bad to be killed off.
Why do molecules frolicking in the soup wish to reporduce and live at all?
There must be a "life force", if you like, that drives the molecules to expend energy in the direction of reproduction.
Nature does nothing without a force driving the change.
So you think that God created you so that you would like food that's bad for you? Is that your proof intelligent design?
True for food. But isn't beer the "best" drink for us?
Super argument!