Simple argument is for those of simple thought. Furthermore argument is of philosophy and would seek to prove or disprove (faith, belief, or the unknown) without evidence, empirical evidence or material fact but by argument, debate, and deduction. Evolution is of science which is composed of facts and evidence. It is a sad day when one would argue his philosophy without knowledge of the differences in philosophy, science and mathematics for only agenda. It is a detriment to self and reveals deficiencies. I see.
So, in your estimation, logical deduction is not only irrelevant, but undesirable, relative to a debating forum, let alone science in general.
As I said, you're just another clueless evolution advocate.
So, in your estimation, logical deduction is not only irrelevant, but undesirable, relative to a debating forum, let alone science in general. As I said, you're just another clueless evolution advocate. Logical deduction is used to prove or disprove one's philosophy. Philosophy also defines what is logical and not logical. Those who would assert opinion by accusation and name calling are only of opinion and logic is not required. It is the agenda of one who seeks to promote self and demote others by vile intent and without capable logic or coherent thought. A opinion-est.