Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GLDNGUN

yes and this latest junk science is recyled punctuated equilibria.......this has as many scientific problems as Darwin's explanation


231 posted on 02/10/2006 9:27:39 PM PST by caffe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: caffe
yes and this latest junk science is recyled punctuated equilibria.......this has as many scientific problems as Darwin's explanation

I know. The evos love to say how "solid" a scientific "theory" really is and us do-dos just don't understand. Comparing the "theory" of gravity to evolution is ludicrous. Drop an apple and you'll see gravity in action. Gravity itself is not a theory but an observable reality. Exactly how gravity works is open to theory. Evolution, on the other hand, specifically MACRO-evolution IS a theory. We can not observe this type in action, as we can gravity. Of course, the evos demand evolution is fact and that there are few unanswered questions. This article proves otherwise. It shows that while the evos firmly believe in evolution, HOW we got from point A to point B is NOT firm.

Ultimately, they are open to just about any theory that shows we got from point A to point B, as long as God or intelligent design is not involved. Of course, the problem there is, that if God/Intelligent Design IS involved, they are purposefully avoiding the truth.

It's like the guy who walked out of a bar and observed some smokers hanging around the entrance, puffing away. Across the street he saw a friend on all fours looking around for something. He went over to his friend to see what was going on. His friend explained he dropped his wallet when he walked out of the bar and someone bumped into him, and now he was trying to find it. So the guy says to him "if you dropped your wallet walking out of the bar, why are you on the other side of the street looking for it?" His friend replied, "well, I don't like to be around all those smokers".

Another way of looking at it, would be to come up on a log cabin in the woods and devising the most plausible explanation for the cabin's existence WITHOUT taking intelligent design and construction into consideration. After all, you didn't observe it being built, so it must have been the result of "chance and time" interacting with falling trees. You know, like the idiot who said given enough time, a monkey hammering away at a typewriter would eventually type the 23rd Psalm perfectly. Uh-huh.

267 posted on 02/11/2006 10:16:53 AM PST by GLDNGUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson